Measurement uncertainty and its implications for collaborative study method validation and method performance parameters

被引:23
作者
Ellison, SLR [1 ]
Williams, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Lab Govt Chemist, Teddington TW11 0LY, Middx, England
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s007690050174
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
ISO principles of measurement uncertainty estimation are compared with protocols for method development and validation by collaborative trial and concomitant "top-down" estimation of uncertainty. It is shown that there is substantial commonality between the two procedures. In particular, both require a careful consideration and study of the main effects on the result. Most of the information required to evaluate measurement uncertainty is therefore gathered during the method development and validation process. However, the information is not generally published in sufficient detail at present; recommendations are accordingly made for future reporting of the data.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 10
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, J ASSOC OFF ANA CHEM, V72, P694
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, ANALYST, V120, P2303
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, 5725 ISO
[4]  
ELLISON SLR, 1996, USE RECOVERY FACTORS
[5]  
*EURACHEM, 1995, QUANT UNC AN MEAS
[6]   YOUNG ANALYSTS START HERE [J].
FLEMING, J .
ANALYTICAL PROCEEDINGS, 1995, 32 (11) :481-481
[7]   PROTOCOL FOR THE DESIGN, CONDUCT AND INTERPRETATION OF METHOD-PERFORMANCE STUDIES [J].
HORWITZ, W .
PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY, 1995, 67 (02) :331-343
[8]  
International Organization for Standardization, 1993, GUID EXPR UNC MEAS
[9]   THE VAM PRINCIPLES [J].
SARGENT, M .
ANALYTICAL PROCEEDINGS, 1995, 32 (05) :201-202
[10]  
WILLIAMS A, 1991, ACCRED QUAL ASSUR, V1, P14