Productivity growth and the effects of R&D in African agriculture

被引:102
作者
Alene, Arega D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Inst Trop Agr, Lilongwe, Malawi
关键词
O33; O47; O55; Q16; TFP; Technical change; R&D; Rate of return; Africa; DETECTING OUTLIERS; TECHNICAL PROGRESS; EFFICIENCY CHANGE; COUNTRIES; RETURNS; PRICES; MODELS; LAG; UK;
D O I
10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00450.x
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
120302 [林业经济管理];
摘要
This article measures and compares total factor productivity growth in African agriculture under contemporaneous and sequential technology frontiers over the period 1970-2004. The sources of productivity growth are examined using a fixed-effects regression model and a polynomial distributed lag structure for agricultural R&D expenditures. While conventional estimates show an average productivity growth rate of only 0.3% per year, the improved measures under sequential technology show that African agricultural productivity grew at a higher rate of 1.8% per year. Technical progress, rather than efficiency change, was the principal source of productivity growth. Agricultural R&D, weather, and trade reforms turned out to have significant effects on productivity in African agriculture. With a rate of return of 33% per year, R&D is shown to be a socially profitable investment in African agriculture. While a strong R&D expenditure growth of about 2% per year in the 1970s led to strong productivity growth after the mid 1980s, stagnation of R&D expenditure in the 1980s and early 1990s led to slower productivity growth in the 2000s. Consistent with recent economic recovery in Africa evidenced by stronger agricultural GDP growth rates, results showed that policy reforms as well as improved weather contributed to the recovery of agricultural productivity after the mid 1980s.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 238
页数:16
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]
Alston J.M., 2000, 113 IFPRI
[2]
Alston J.M., 1995, Science under Scarcity: Principles and Practice for Agricultural Research Evaluation and Priority Setting
[3]
Alston JM, 1998, EPTD Disc. Pap. 35
[4]
BEINTEMA NM, 2006, AGR RES DEV SUBSAHAR
[5]
A NEW VIEW OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA [J].
BLOCK, SA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1994, 76 (03) :619-624
[6]
Nonparametric frontier estimation: a robust approach [J].
Cazals, C ;
Florens, JP ;
Simar, L .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2002, 106 (01) :1-25
[7]
Coelli T., 1996, GUIDE DEAP VERSION 2
[8]
Total factor productivity growth in agriculture: a Malmquist index analysis of 93 countries, 1980-2000 [J].
Coelli, Tim J. ;
Rao, D. S. Prasada .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 32 :115-134
[9]
International productivity patterns: Accounting for input quality, infrastructure, and research [J].
Craig, BJ ;
Pardey, PG ;
Roseboom, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 79 (04) :1064-1076
[10]
Avila AFD, 2010, HBK ECON, V18, P3769, DOI 10.1016/S1574-0072(09)04072-9