A genetic algorithm based method for product family design optimization

被引:76
作者
D'Souza, B [1 ]
Simpson, TW [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Ind & Mfg Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
manufacturing; product family; product platform; commonality; multiobjective optimization; genetic algorithm;
D O I
10.1080/0305215031000069663
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Increased commonality in a family of products can simplify manufacturing and reduce the associated costs and lead-times. There is a tradeoff, however, between commonality and individual product performance within a product family, and this paper introduces a genetic algorithm based method to help find an acceptable balance between commonality in the product family and desired performance of the individual products in the family The method uses (1) Design of Experiments to help screen unimportant factors and identify factors of interest to the product family, and (2) a multiobjective genetic algorithm, the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm, to optimize the performance of the products in the resulting family. To demonstrate implementation of the proposed method, the design of a family of three General Aviation Aircraft is presented along with a product variety tradeoff study to determine the extent of the tradeoff between commonality and individual product performance within the aircraft family. The efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed method are illustrated by comparing the family of aircraft against individually optimized designs and designs obtained from an alternate gradient-based multiobjective optimization method.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 18
页数:18
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Bremmer R., 1999, Financial Times Automotive World, P30
[2]  
CHIDAMBARAM B, 1999, ASME DES ENG TECHN C
[3]  
Collier D. A., 1981, Decision Sciences, V12, P85, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1981.tb00063.x
[4]  
CROARKIN C, 1998, ENG STAT INTERNET HD
[5]   A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II [J].
Deb, K ;
Pratap, A ;
Agarwal, S ;
Meyarivan, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) :182-197
[6]  
DSOUZA B, 2002, THESIS PENNSYLVANIA
[7]  
Feitzinger E, 1997, HARVARD BUS REV, V75, P116
[8]  
FUJITA K, 1998, ASME DES ENG TECHN C
[9]  
FUJITA K, 1999, ASME DES ENG TECHN C
[10]  
Goldberg D. E., 1989, GENETIC ALGORITHMS S