A threshold method to improve standardized uptake value reproducibility

被引:58
作者
Lee, JR [1 ]
Madsen, MT [1 ]
Bushnel, D [1 ]
Menda, Y [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Edward Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00006231-200007000-00013
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Although standardized uptake values (SUV) are widely used to quantify the uptake of F-18- fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) in tumours, there are systematic differences in the way this index is applied by different investigators. The aims of this study were to compare the effects of using maximum or mean region counts in the calculation of SUV and to investigate an alternative technique based on a fixed fraction of the maximum counts. Simulated PET projections of the thorax were generated together with spherical lesions that varied in diameter from 1.6 to 4.8 cm with uptake values of 2, 4 and 8. The lesion SUVs were determined using either the maximum (SUVmax) or mean count (SUVmean) values found in regions circumscribing the lesion. In addition, average values were calculated that only included region pixels that exceeded a selected fraction of maximum value (SUV0.6max or SUV0.75max). These methods were also applied to six clinical F-18-FDG PET studies with a total of 12 lesions. The SUVs for these lesions were determined independently by four observers. Decreases with respect to SUVmax of 57%, 23% and 14% were found for SUVmean, SUV0.6max and SUV0.75max approaches respectively in the simulation study. The variation in SUVmean with region size was 35%, while the SUV0.6max and SUV0.75max was less than 3%. Similar results were obtained for the clinical data. We conclude that the proposed technique produces SUVs that are essentially independent of lesion region size and shape. It is expected that this will provide a more stable and reliable result than current approaches. ((C) 2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins).
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 690
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   FDG imaging of lung nodules: A phantom study comparing SPECT, camera-based PET, and dedicated PET [J].
Coleman, RE ;
Laymon, CM ;
Turkington, TG .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 210 (03) :823-828
[2]  
Eary JF, 1998, J NUCL MED, V39, P250
[3]   Differentiating benign from malignant lung lesions using ''quantitative'' parameters of FDG PET images [J].
Hubner, KF ;
Buonocore, E ;
Gould, HR ;
Thie, J ;
Smith, GT ;
Stephens, S ;
Dickey, J .
CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1996, 21 (12) :941-949
[4]  
KEYES JW, 1995, J NUCL MED, V36, P1836
[5]  
KIM CK, 1994, J NUCL MED, V35, P164
[6]   Dependency of standardized uptake values of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose on body size: Comparison of body surface area correction and lean body mass correction [J].
Kim, CK ;
Gupta, NC .
NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 1996, 17 (10) :890-894
[7]  
Kole AC, 1997, J NUCL MED, V38, P692
[8]  
LOWE VJ, 1995, J NUCL MED, V36, P883
[9]  
LOWE VJ, 1994, J NUCL MED, V35, P1771
[10]   Staging non-small cell lung cancer with whole-body PET [J].
Marom, EM ;
McAdams, HP ;
Erasmus, JJ ;
Goodman, PC ;
Culhane, DK ;
Coleman, RE ;
Herndon, JE ;
Patz, EF .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 212 (03) :803-809