Characteristics and Outcomes of America's Lowest-Performing Hospitals An Analysis of Acute Myocardial Infarction Hospital Care in the United States

被引:30
作者
Popescu, Ioana [1 ,2 ]
Werner, Rachel M. [3 ,4 ]
Vaughan-Sarrazin, Mary S. [1 ,2 ]
Cram, Peter [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Iowa City VA Med Ctr, Ctr Res Implementat Innovat Strategies Practice, Iowa City, IA USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Carver Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Iowa City, IA 52240 USA
[3] Philadelphia VA Med Ctr, Ctr Hlth Equ Res & Promot, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
myocadial infarction; hospitals; quality of health care; QUALITY-OF-CARE; SAFETY-NET HOSPITALS; MORTALITY-RATES; US HOSPITALS; FOR-PROFIT; MEDICARE; IMPROVEMENT; DIFFERENCE; OWNERSHIP; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.813790
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-Studies suggest that most hospitals now have relatively high adherence with recommended acute myocardial infarction (AMI) process measures. Little is known about hospitals with consistently poor adherence with AMI process measures and whether these hospitals also have increased patient mortality. Methods and Results-We conducted a retrospective study of 2761 US hospitals reporting AMI process measures to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Hospital Compare database during 2004 to 2006 that could be linked to 2005 Medicare Part A data. The main outcome measures were hospitals' combined compliance with 5 AMI measures (aspirin and beta-blocker on admission and discharge and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker use at discharge for patients with left ventricular dysfunction) and risk-adjusted 30-day mortality for 2005. We stratified hospitals into those with low AMI adherence (ranked in the lowest decile for AMI adherence for 3 consecutive years [2004-2006, n=105]), high adherence (ranked in the top decile for 3 consecutive years [n=63]), and intermediate adherence (all others [n=2593]). Mean AMI performance varied significantly across low-, intermediate-, and high-performing hospitals (mean score, 68% versus 92% versus 99%, P<0.001). Low-performing hospitals were more likely than intermediate-and high-performing hospitals to be safety-net providers (19.2% versus 11.0% versus 6.4%; P=0.005). Low-performing hospitals had higher unadjusted 30-day mortality rates (23.6% versus 17.8% versus 14.9%; P<0.001). These differences persisted after adjustment for patient characteristics (16.3% versus 16.0% versus 15.7%; P=0.02). Conclusion-Consistently low-performing hospitals differ substantially from other US hospitals. Targeting quality improvement efforts toward these hospitals may offer an attractive opportunity for improving AMI outcomes. (Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009; 2: 221-227.)
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 227
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Using public reports of patient satisfaction for hospital quality improvement [J].
Barr, Judith K. ;
Giannotti, Tierney E. ;
Sofaer, Shoshanna ;
Duquette, Cathy E. ;
Waters, William J. ;
Petrillo, Marcia K. .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2006, 41 (03) :663-682
[2]   The influence of health policy and market factors on the hospital safety net [J].
Bazzoli, Gloria J. ;
Lindrooth, Richard C. ;
Kang, Ray ;
Hasnain-Wynia, Romana .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2006, 41 (04) :1159-1180
[3]   Quality improvement efforts and hospital performance - Rates of beta-blocker prescription after acute myocardial infarction [J].
Bradley, EH ;
Herrin, J ;
Mattera, JA ;
Holmboe, ES ;
Wang, YF ;
Frederick, P ;
Roumanis, SA ;
Radford, MJ ;
Krumholz, HM .
MEDICAL CARE, 2005, 43 (03) :282-292
[4]   Hospital-level performance improvement - Beta-blocker use after acute myocardial infarction [J].
Bradley, EH ;
Herrin, J ;
Mattera, JA ;
Holmboe, ES ;
Wang, YF ;
Frederick, P ;
Roumanis, SA ;
Radford, MJ ;
Krumhoz, HM .
MEDICAL CARE, 2004, 42 (06) :591-599
[5]   Hospital quality for acute myocardial infarction - Correlation among process measures and relationship with short-term mortality [J].
Bradley, Elizabeth H. ;
Herrin, Jeph ;
Elbel, Brian ;
McNamara, Robert L. ;
Magid, David J. ;
Nallamothu, Brahmajee K. ;
Wang, Yongfei ;
Normand, Sharon-Lise T. ;
Spertus, John A. ;
Krumholz, Harlan M. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 296 (01) :72-78
[6]   Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data [J].
Elixhauser, A ;
Steiner, C ;
Harris, DR ;
Coffey, RN .
MEDICAL CARE, 1998, 36 (01) :8-27
[7]   When things go wrong: The impact of being a statistical outlier in publicly reported coronary artery bypass graft surgery mortality data [J].
Ettinger, Walter H. ;
Hylka, Sharon M. ;
Phillips, Robert A. ;
Harrison, Lynn H. ;
Cyr, Jay A. ;
Sussman, Andrew J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2008, 23 (02) :90-95
[8]   Public reporting and pay-for-performance: Safety-net hospital executives' concerns and policy suggestions [J].
Goldman, L. Elizabeth ;
Henderson, Stuart ;
Dohan, Daniel P. ;
Talavera, Jason A. ;
Dudley, R. Adams .
INQUIRY-THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION PROVISION AND FINANCING, 2007, 44 (02) :137-145
[9]   IMPROVING THE OUTCOMES OF CORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS-SURGERY IN NEW-YORK-STATE [J].
HANNAN, EL ;
KILBURN, H ;
RACZ, M ;
SHIELDS, E ;
CHASSIN, MR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (10) :761-766
[10]   The risks of risk adjustment [J].
Iezzoni, LI .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 278 (19) :1600-1607