A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda

被引:330
作者
Aronchick, CA [1 ]
Lipshutz, WH [1 ]
Wright, SH [1 ]
Dufrayne, F [1 ]
Bergman, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn Hosp, Dept Med, Gastroenterol Sect, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mge.2000.108480
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Currently available aqueous purgatives used before colonoscopy are poorly tolerated. We designed a tableted sodium phosphate purge that we believe will yield much greater patient acceptance. Methods: A total of 305 outpatients undergoing routine diagnostic colonoscopy were randomized to one of three preparation groups: Colyte (100 patients), Fleet Phospho-Soda (106 patients), or sodium phosphate tablets (99 patients). Endoscopists were blinded to the type of preparation administered and answered a questionnaire regarding preparation quality. Patients answered a questionnaire designed to analyze tolerability. Adverse events were closely followed and recorded. Results: There were no significant differences in quality of preparation across the groups (80% excellent or good, 4% repreparation). Although hypocalcemia (4 of 71), hypokalemia (18 of 68), and hyperphosphatemia (39 of 69) were observed in patients receiving the tablets, no adverse events occurred. Patients preferred taking the tablets over Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda. Conclusion: The evaluation of a novel delivery system of a sodium phosphate purge is described. Intended for use before colonoscopy, it circumvents the poor taste and excessive volume of ingestion that are aversive to patients. The tableted purgative is equally effective, safe, and greatly preferred over the existing aqueous preparations. This may improve patient compliance with recommendations for screening colonoscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 352
页数:7
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]  
Aronchick C., 1999, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V94, P2667
[2]   Oral sodium phosphate versus sulfate-free polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in outpatient preparation for colonoscopy: A prospective comparison [J].
Clarkston, WK ;
Tsen, TN ;
Dies, DF ;
Schratz, CL ;
Vaswani, SK ;
Bjerregaard, P .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 43 (01) :42-48
[3]   PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, ENDOSCOPIC-BLINDED TRIAL COMPARING PRECOLONOSCOPY BOWEL CLEANSING METHODS [J].
COHEN, SM ;
WEXNER, SD ;
BINDEROW, SR ;
NOGUERAS, JJ ;
DANIEL, N ;
EHRENPREIS, ED ;
JENSEN, J ;
BONNER, GF ;
RUDERMAN, WB .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1994, 37 (07) :689-696
[4]  
KOLTS BE, 1993, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V88, P1218
[5]   PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING SODIUM-PHOSPHATE SOLUTION WITH POLYETHYLENE-GLYCOL ELECTROLYTE LAVAGE FOR COLONOSCOPY PREPARATION [J].
MARSHALL, JB ;
PINEDA, JJ ;
BARTHEL, JS ;
KING, PD .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1993, 39 (05) :631-634
[6]  
VANNER SJ, 1990, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V85, P422