Prognostic significance of newly acquired bundle branch block after aortic valve replacement

被引:88
作者
El-Khally, Z [1 ]
Thibault, B [1 ]
Staniloae, C [1 ]
Theroux, P [1 ]
Dubuc, M [1 ]
Roy, D [1 ]
Guerra, P [1 ]
Macle, L [1 ]
Talajic, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Montreal Heart Inst, Montreal, PQ H1T 1C8, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.06.055
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
There is controversy concerning the prognostic significance of conduction delays that occur after aortic valve replacement (AVR). We retrospectively reviewed 389 consecutive patients who underwent AVR at our institution between April 1995 and March 1997. Adverse events were defined as the occurrence of complete atrioventricular block, syncope, or sudden cardiac death. Among 262 patients included in our database, 31 (11.8%) had a preoperative bundle branch block (BBB) and 41 (15.6%) developed new BBB postoperatively. At a mean follow-up of 54 months, the event rate was 1.6% (3 of 190) in patients with no BBB versus 17% (7 of 41, p = 0.0004) in patients who developed new BBB after surgery. There were 4 events (4 of 15 = 26.6%, p = 0.0006) in patients who developed new left BBB and 3 (3 of 26, 11.5%, p = 0.02) in those who developed new right BBB after AVR. There was also an increased adverse event rate in patients who had preoperative BBB (3 of 31, 9.7% p = 0.037). By multivariate analysis, a new and persistent BBB acquired after surgery was the only independent predictor of adverse events during follow-up (odds ratio 8.85, p = 0.0004). The highest event rate was seen in patients who developed new left BBB and left axis deviation after surgery. Most events occurred during the first year of follow-up. A new and persistent BBB acquired after AVR is associated with an increased adverse event rate. This finding suggests that early prophylactic pacemaker implantation should be considered in these patients. (C) 2004 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1008 / 1011
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
COPELAND JG, 1977, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V74, P875
[2]  
FOLLATH F, 1972, BRIT HEART J, V34, P553
[3]  
FOURNIAL JF, 1979, ARCH MAL COEUR VAISS, V72, P4
[4]  
FUDUKA T, 1976, CHEST, V69, P605
[5]   CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF BUNDLE-BRANCH BLOCK COMPLICATING ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION .1. CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS, HOSPITAL MORTALITY, AND ONE-YEAR FOLLOW-UP [J].
HINDMAN, MC ;
WAGNER, GS ;
JARO, M ;
ATKINS, JM ;
SCHEINMAN, MM ;
DESANCTIS, RW ;
HUTTER, AH ;
YEATMAN, L ;
RUBENFIRE, M ;
PUJURA, C ;
RUBIN, M ;
MORRIS, JJ .
CIRCULATION, 1978, 58 (04) :679-688
[6]   INDEXES PREDICTING LONG-TERM SURVIVAL AFTER VALVE-REPLACEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH AORTIC REGURGITATION AND PATIENTS WITH AORTIC-STENOSIS [J].
HIRSHFELD, JW ;
EPSTEIN, SE ;
ROBERTS, AJ ;
GLANCY, DL ;
MORROW, AG .
CIRCULATION, 1974, 50 (06) :1190-1199
[7]   Development and validation of a simple risk score to predict the need for permanent pacing after cardiac valve surgery [J].
Koplan, BA ;
Stevenson, WG ;
Epstein, LM ;
Aranki, SF ;
Maisel, WH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (05) :795-801
[8]  
Lorenzoni R, 1995, G Ital Cardiol, V25, P1031
[9]   SIGNIFICANCE OF BUNDLE-BRANCH BLOCK DURING ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION [J].
NIMETZ, AA ;
SHUBROOKS, SJ ;
HUTTER, AM ;
DESANCTIS, RW .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1975, 90 (04) :439-444
[10]  
PLACK RH, 1989, CHEST, V6, P1201