A proposed continuous quality improvement approach to assessment and management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis without formal joint counts, based on quantitative Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID) scores on a Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ)

被引:67
作者
Pincus, Theodore
Yazici, Yusuf
Bergman, Martin
Maclean, Ross
Harrington, Timothy
机构
[1] NYU, Hosp Joint Dis, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Taylor Hosp, Ridley Park, PA 19078 USA
[3] Bristol Myers Squibb Co, Princeton, NJ USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI USA
来源
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY | 2007年 / 21卷 / 04期
关键词
continuous quality improvement; MDHAQ; RAPID; Plan-Do-Study-Act;
D O I
10.1016/j.berh.2007.02.009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
A continuous quality improvement approach is proposed for the assessment and management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) based on scores on a one-page patient self-report multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ), without formal joint counts.. The approach includes five simple steps before the patient is seen by the physician: (1) an MDHAQ is completed by every patient at every visit; (2) scores are calculated for patient function, pain, and global estimate, with options for a self-report joint count and other scales; (3) scores are entered on flow sheets with data from prior visits, which might also include laboratory and medication information; (4) scores are compiled into an index termed Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID), analogous to a Disease Activity Score (DAS); (5) RAPID scores are classified to guide treatment decisions. RAPID 3 includes the three patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in the RA Core Data Set - physical function, pain, and global estimate. RAPID 4 adds a self-report joint count, and RAPID 5, a physician global estimate. RAPID 3 can be calculated in about 10 seconds, RAPID 4 in about 19 seconds, and RAPID 5 in about 20 seconds. RAPID 3, RAPID 4, and RAPID 5 give similar results to distinguish active from control treatments in RA clinical trials, at levels similar to American College of Rheumatology or DAS improvement criteria, and are all correlated significantly with DAS28 (rho = 0.62-0.64, P < 0.00 1). A proposed classification of RAPID scores, analogous to four DAS28 categories, includes: 'near remissior, low severity' (1.01-2), 'moderate severity' (2.01-4), and 'high severity' (> 4). RAPID scoring is feasible in standard clinical care to support continuous quality improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:789 / 804
页数:16
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]
Aletaha D, 2005, CLIN EXP RHEUMATOL, V23, pS100
[2]
A primer on leading the improvement of systems [J].
Berwick, DM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 312 (7031) :619-622
[3]
CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT AS AN IDEAL IN HEALTH-CARE [J].
BERWICK, DM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 320 (01) :53-56
[4]
Callahan L F, 1989, Arthritis Care Res, V2, P122, DOI 10.1002/anr.1790020406
[5]
QUANTITATIVE PAIN ASSESSMENT FOR ROUTINE CARE OF RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS PATIENTS, USING A PAIN SCALE BASED ON ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING AND A VISUAL ANALOG PAIN SCALE [J].
CALLAHAN, LF ;
BROOKS, RH ;
SUMMEY, JA ;
PINCUS, T .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1987, 30 (06) :630-636
[6]
What do self-administered joint counts tell us about patients with rheumatoid arthritis? [J].
Escalante, A .
ARTHRITIS CARE AND RESEARCH, 1998, 11 (04) :280-290
[7]
MEASUREMENT OF PATIENT OUTCOME IN ARTHRITIS [J].
FRIES, JF ;
SPITZ, P ;
KRAINES, RG ;
HOLMAN, HR .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1980, 23 (02) :137-145
[8]
GOLDSMITH CH, 1993, J RHEUMATOL, V20, P575
[9]
Hanly JG, 1996, J RHEUMATOL, V23, P1531
[10]
HEWLETT SE, 1995, BRIT J RHEUMATOL, V34, P547