Contrastive Constraints Guide Explanation-Based Category Learning

被引:15
作者
Chin-Parker, Seth [1 ]
Cantelon, Julie [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Denison Univ, Dept Psychol, Knapp Hall, Granville, OH 43023 USA
[2] Tufts Univ, Ctr Appl Brain & Cognit Sci, Medford, MA USA
[3] US Army Natick Soldier Res Dev & Engn Ctr, Natick, MA USA
关键词
Explanation; Contrast class; Category learning; Context effects; Generalization;
D O I
10.1111/cogs.12405
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This paper provides evidence for a contrastive account of explanation that is motivated by pragmatic theories that recognize the contribution that context makes to the interpretation of a prompt for explanation. This study replicates the primary findings of previous work in explanation-based category learning (Williams & Lombrozo, 2010), extending that work by illustrating the critical role of the context in this type of learning. Participants interacted with items from two categories either by describing the items or explaining their category membership. We manipulated the feature overlap between the categories and examined both the explanations generated and acquired knowledge of the categories. Explanations for membership in a given category were influenced by the unprompted contrast category, indicating an important role for contrastive processing in the generation of explanations. The influence of the contrast category was similarly seen in the transfer performance of the participants.
引用
收藏
页码:1645 / 1655
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SCI IMAGE
[2]  
Chi MTH, 2000, ADV INSTR P, V5, P161
[3]  
CHI MTH, 1994, COGNITIVE SCI, V18, P439, DOI 10.1016/0364-0213(94)90016-7
[4]   Diagnosticity and prototypicality in category learning: A comparison of inference learning and classification learning [J].
Chin-Parker, S ;
Ross, BH .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2004, 30 (01) :216-226
[5]  
Chin-Parker S., 2006, Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the cognitive science society, P1098
[6]   Background shifts affect explanatory style: how a pragmatic theory of explanation accounts for background effects in the generation of explanations [J].
Chin-Parker, Seth ;
Bradner, Alexandra .
COGNITIVE PROCESSING, 2010, 11 (03) :227-249
[7]   Contrast class cues and performance facilitation in a hypothesis-testing task: evidence for an iterative counterfactual model [J].
Gale, Maggie ;
Ball, Linden J. .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2012, 40 (03) :408-419
[8]   Similarity in context [J].
Goldstone, RL ;
Medin, DL ;
Halberstadt, J .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1997, 25 (02) :237-255
[9]   CONVERSATIONAL PROCESSES AND CAUSAL EXPLANATION [J].
HILTON, DJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1990, 107 (01) :65-81
[10]   Functional explanation and the function of explanation [J].
Lombrozo, T ;
Carey, S .
COGNITION, 2006, 99 (02) :167-204