Allocating pupils to their nearest secondary school: The consequences for social and ability stratification

被引:80
作者
Allen, Rebecca [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London, Inst Educ, Bedford Grp Lifecourse & State Studies, London WC1H 0AL, England
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00420980601184737
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study examines the proposition that secondary school choice in England has produced a stratified education system, compared with a counterfactual world where pupils are allocated into schools based strictly on proximity via a simulation that exploits the availability of pupil postcodes in the National Pupil Database. The study finds current levels of sorting in the English secondary school system-defined as pupils who do not attend their proximity allocation school-to be around 50 per cent, but estimates that only one-in-five pupils are potentially active in sorting between non-faith comprehensive schools. School segregation is almost always lower in the proximity counterfactual than in the actual data, confirming that where pupils are sorting themselves into a non-proximity school, it does tend to increase social and ability segregation. The difference between school and residential segregation is greatest in urban areas and LEAs with many pupils in grammar and voluntary-aided schools.
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 770
页数:20
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
ALLEN R, 2006, WHAT SHOULD INDEX SC
[2]  
Ammermueller A., 2006, Peer effects in European primary schools: Evidence from PIRLS (No. w12180)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, UNDERACHIEVEMENT SCH
[4]   Do better schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary education [J].
Black, SE .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1999, 114 (02) :577-599
[5]  
BURGESS S, IN PRESS SCH EQUAL O
[6]  
Burgess S., 2005, Will More Choice Improve Outcomes in Education and Health Care? The Evidence from Economic Research
[7]   On measuring segregation in samples with small units [J].
Carrington, WJ ;
Troske, KR .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 1997, 15 (04) :402-409
[8]   FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS ON METHODOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF SEGREGATION INDEXES [J].
CORTESE, CF ;
FALK, RF ;
COHEN, JK .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1976, 41 (04) :630-637
[9]  
Croxford L., 2000, ED RES EVALUATION, V6, P317, DOI DOI 10.1076/EDRE.6.4.317.6933
[10]  
*DFES, 1999, COD PRACT SCH ADM