An exploration of relative health stock in advanced cancer patients

被引:19
作者
Gaskin, DJ
Weinfurt, KR
Castel, LD
DePuy, V
Li, Y
Balshem, A
Benson, A
Burnett, CB
Corbett, S
Marshall, J
Slater, E
Sulmasy, DR
Van Echo, D
Meropol, NJ
Schulman, KA
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Duke Univ, Durham, NC USA
[3] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[5] Georgetown Univ, Washington, DC USA
[6] St Vincents Manhattan & New York Med Coll, New York, NY USA
[7] Univ Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
patient preferences; decision making; clinical trials; cancer; phase I trials;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X04271041
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. The authors sought to empirically test whether relative health stock, a measure of patients' sense of loss in their health due to illness, influences the treatment decisions of patients facing life-threatening, conditions. Specifically, they estimated the effect of relative health stock on advanced cancer patients' decisions to participate in phase I clinical trials. Method. A multicenter study was conducted to survey 328 advanced cancer patients who were offered the opportunity to participate in phase I trials. The authors asked patients to estimate the probabilities of therapeutic benefits and toxicity, their relative health stock, risk preference, and the importance of quality of life. Results. Controlling for health-related quality of life, an increase in relative health stock by 10 percentage points reduced the odds of choosing to participate in a phase I trial by 16% (odds ratio = 0.84, 95% confidence interval = 0.72, 0,97). Conclusion. Relative health stock affects advanced cancer patients' treatment decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:614 / 624
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Ethics of phase 1 oncology studies - Reexamining the arguments and data [J].
Agrawal, M ;
Emanuel, EJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (08) :1075-1082
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, ANAL INCOMPLETE MULT, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781439821862
[3]   FALSE HOPES AND BEST DATA - CONSENT TO RESEARCH AND THE THERAPEUTIC MISCONCEPTION [J].
APPELBAUM, PS ;
ROTH, LH ;
LIDZ, CW ;
BENSON, P ;
WINSLADE, W .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1987, 17 (02) :20-24
[4]   Impact of quality of life on patient expectations regarding phase I clinical trials [J].
Cheng, JD ;
Hitt, J ;
Koczwara, B ;
Schulman, KA ;
Burnett, CB ;
Gaskin, DJ ;
Rowland, JH ;
Meropol, NJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (02) :421-428
[5]   HOW PHYSICIANS DEAL WITH THEIR OWN IMPENDING DEATH [J].
CLARK, DB ;
RAM, MD ;
MACDONALD, JS ;
REES, ED ;
ENGELBERG, J ;
NOBLE, RC .
SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1990, 83 (04) :441-447
[6]   PERCEPTIONS OF CANCER-PATIENTS AND THEIR PHYSICIANS INVOLVED IN PHASE-I TRIALS [J].
DAUGHERTY, C ;
RATAIN, MJ ;
GROCHOWSKI, E ;
STOCKING, C ;
KODISH, E ;
MICK, R ;
SIEGLER, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (05) :1062-1072
[7]   COGNITIVE DISSONANCE [J].
FESTINGER, L .
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1962, 207 (04) :93-&
[8]   THE UTILITY ANALYSIS OF CHOICES INVOLVING RISK [J].
Friedman, Milton ;
Savage, L. J. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1948, 56 (04) :279-304
[9]   Treatment choices by seriously Ill patients: The health stock risk adjustment model [J].
Gaskin, DJ ;
Kong, J ;
Meropol, NJ ;
Yabroff, KR ;
Weaver, C ;
Schulman, KA .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1998, 18 (01) :84-94
[10]  
GROPSSMAN M, 1972, J POLIT ECON, V80, P168