Nodal distance algorithm: Calculating a phylogenetic tree comparison metric

被引:27
作者
Bluis, J [1 ]
Shin, DG [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
来源
THIRD IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOENGINEERING - BIBE 2003, PROCEEDINGS | 2003年
关键词
tree comparison; phylogenetic tree; algorithm;
D O I
10.1109/BIBE.2003.1188933
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Maintaining a phylogenetic relationship repository requires the development of tools that are useful for mining the data stored in the repository. One way to query a database of phylogenetic information would be to compare phylogenetic trees. Because the only existing tree comparison methods are computationally intensive, this is not a reasonable task. Presented here is the nodal distance algorithm which has significantly less computation time than the most widely used comparison method, the partition metric. When the metric is calculated for trees where one species has been repositioned to a distant part of the tree no further computation is required as is needed for the partition metric. The nodal distance algorithm provides a method for comparing large sets of phylogenetic trees in a reasonable amount of time.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 94
页数:8
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Bluis J, 2001, 2ND ANNUAL IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, P166, DOI 10.1109/BIBE.2001.974426
[2]   EVOLUTIONARY PATTERNS IN SOME PUTATIVE AUSTRALIAN SPECIES IN THE ANT GENUS RHYTIDOPONERA [J].
CROZIER, RH ;
PAMILO, P ;
TAYLOR, RW ;
CROZIER, YC .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1986, 34 (04) :535-560
[3]   COMPARISON OF UNDIRECTED PHYLOGENETIC TREES BASED ON SUBTREES OF 4 EVOLUTIONARY UNITS [J].
ESTABROOK, GF ;
MCMORRIS, FR ;
MEACHAM, CA .
SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1985, 34 (02) :193-200
[4]   COMPARING SHAPES OF TAXONOMIC TREES [J].
FARRIS, JS .
SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1973, 22 (01) :50-54
[5]   APPLICATION AND ACCURACY OF MOLECULAR PHYLOGENIES [J].
HILLIS, DM ;
HUELSENBECK, JP ;
CUNNINGHAM, CW .
SCIENCE, 1994, 264 (5159) :671-677
[6]   Evolution - The coming of age of molecular systematics [J].
Maley, LE ;
Marshall, CR .
SCIENCE, 1998, 279 (5350) :505-506
[7]   Microbial genome analyses: Global comparisons of transport capabilities based on phylogenies, bioenergetics and substrate specificities [J].
Paulsen, IT ;
Sliwinski, MK ;
Saier, MH .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1998, 277 (03) :573-592
[8]   THE USE OF TREE COMPARISON METRICS [J].
PENNY, D ;
HENDY, MD .
SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1985, 34 (01) :75-82
[9]   COMPARISON OF PHYLOGENETIC TREES [J].
ROBINSON, DF ;
FOULDS, LR .
MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES, 1981, 53 (1-2) :131-147
[10]  
ROBINSON DF, 1979, LECT NOTES MATH, V748, P119