Accelerating US EHR adoption: How to get there from here. Recommendations based on the 2004 ACMI retreat

被引:80
作者
Middleton, B
Hammond, WE
Brennan, PF
Cooper, GF
机构
[1] Parthers HealthCare, Clin Informat Res & Dev, Ctr IT Leadership, Wellesley, MA 02481 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Community & Family Med, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Biomed Engn, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[5] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Nursing, Madison, WI USA
[6] Univ Wisconsin, Coll Engn, Madison, WI USA
[7] Univ Pittsburgh, Ctr Biomed Informat, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1197/jamia.M1669
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Despite growing support for the adoption of electronic health records (EHR) to improve U.S. healthcare delivery; EHR adoption in the United States is slow to date due to a fundamental failure of the healthcare information technology marketplace. Reasons for the slow adoption of healthcare information technology include a misalignment of incentives, limited purchasing power among providers, variability in the viability of EHR products and companies, and limited demonstrated value of EHRs in practice. At the 2004 American College of Medical Informatics (ACMI) Retreat, attendees discussed the current state of EHR adoption in this country and identified steps that could be taken to stimulate adoption. In this paper, based upon the ACMI retreat, and building upon the experiences of the authors developing EHR in academic and commercial settings we identify a set of recommendations to stimulate adoption of EHR, including financial incentives, promotion of EHR standards, enabling policy, and educational, marketing, and supporting activities for both the provider community and healthcare consumers.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 19
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, ERR IS HUMAN BUILDIN, DOI DOI 10.17226/9728
[2]   Factors and forces affecting EHR system adoption: Report of a 2004 ACMI discussion [J].
Ash, JS ;
Bates, DW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2005, 12 (01) :8-12
[3]   Using information systems to measure and improve quality [J].
Bates, DW ;
Pappius, E ;
Kuperman, GJ ;
Sittig, D ;
Burstin, H ;
Fairchild, D ;
Brennan, TA ;
Teich, JM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 1999, 53 (2-3) :115-124
[4]   Patient safety: Improving safety with information technology [J].
Bates, DW ;
Gawande, AA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 348 (25) :2526-2534
[5]   Will the wave finally break? A brief view of the adoption of electronic medical records in the United States [J].
Berner, ES ;
Detmer, DE ;
Simborg, D .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2005, 12 (01) :3-7
[6]  
Birkmeyer Christian M, 2002, Eff Clin Pract, V5, P67
[7]   Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: Effect of process and outcomes measures [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Dimick, JB .
SURGERY, 2004, 135 (06) :569-575
[8]  
BRAILER DJ, 2003, MOVING ELECT HLTH IN
[9]  
Committee on quality of health care in America-Institute of Medicine, 2001, CROSS QUAL CHASM NEW
[10]  
de Brantes Francois, 2003, J Healthc Qual, V25, P11