Number of sellers, average prices, and price dispersion

被引:112
作者
Barron, JM [1 ]
Taylor, BA
Umbeck, JR
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Econ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Baylor Univ, Dept Econ, Waco, TX 76798 USA
关键词
search costs; price dispersion; retail gasoline;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijindorg.2004.05.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A variety of models provide differing predictions regarding the effect of an increase in the number of competitors in a market (seller density) on prices and price dispersion. We review different approaches to generating equilibrium price dispersion and then empirically estimate the relationship between seller density, average product price and price dispersion in the retail gasoline industry using four unique gasoline price data sets. Controlling for station-level characteristics, we find that an increase in station density consistently decreases both price levels and price dispersion across four geographical areas. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1041 / 1066
页数:26
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Abbott T, 1994, J ECON BUS, V46, P21
[2]  
Adams AF, 1997, REV IND ORGAN, V12, P801
[3]   PRICE CONTROLS, PRICE DISPERSION AND THE SUPPLY OF REFINED PETROLEUM-PRODUCTS [J].
AGARWAL, VB ;
DEACON, RT .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1985, 7 (04) :210-219
[4]   Pricing, product diversity, and search costs: a Bertrand-Chamberlin-Diamond model [J].
Anderson, SP ;
Renault, R .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1999, 30 (04) :719-735
[5]   OLIGOPOLISTIC COMPETITION AND THE OPTIMAL PROVISION OF PRODUCTS [J].
ANDERSON, SP ;
DEPALMA, A ;
NESTEROV, Y .
ECONOMETRICA, 1995, 63 (06) :1281-1301
[6]  
Anderson SP, 2001, J IND ECON, V49, P113
[7]   Consumer information and firm pricing: Negative externalities from improved information [J].
Anderson, SP ;
Renault, R .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2000, 41 (03) :721-742
[8]  
ANDERSON SP, 2002, PRICE DISPERSION
[9]  
Barron JM, 2000, ECON INQ, V38, P550
[10]   COMPETITION AND PRICE DISPERSION IN THE UNITED-STATES AIRLINE INDUSTRY [J].
BORENSTEIN, S ;
ROSE, NL .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1994, 102 (04) :653-683