Discriminating between spherical and non-spherical scatterers with lidar using circular polarization: a theoretical study

被引:31
作者
Hu, YX
Yang, P
Lin, B
Gibson, G
Hostetler, C
机构
[1] NASA, Langley Res Ctr, Hampton, VA 23681 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Atmospher Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0022-4073(02)00320-5
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
For ground based observations, depolarization of lidar backscatter indicates that the scattering particles are non-spherical. This property provides a useful means to discriminate between ice particles (non-spherical) and water droplets (spherical) in clouds. However, for space based lidar measurements, backscatter from spherical water cloud particles is also depolarized due to multiple scattering. For the spaceborne lidar application, the discrimination between water and ice is not straightforward. An alternative method for water/ice discrimination that is less sensitive to multiple scattering is proposed in this study. The new approach is based on the differences in P-44 (an element of the scattering phase matrix) at 180degrees scattering angle between spherical and non-spherical particles. By transmitting a circularly polarized beam from the lidar and resolving the rotational sense of the polarization in the receiver, discrimination between spherical and non-spherical scatterers can be accomplished even when multiple scattering occurs. When the incident beam is left-hand-circularly polarized, the circular component of backscatter by a non-spherical particle is weak and possibly left-handed, whereas backscatter by a spherical particle is significantly right-hand-circularly polarized. Monte Carlo simulations with full Stokes vector parameterizations indicate that multiple scattering does not affect the rotational sense of the backscatter polarization, making robust discrimination between spheres and non-spheres possible with this new circular polarization approach. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 764
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Remote sensing of cloud properties using MODIS airborne simulator imagery during SUCCESS 2. Cloud thermodynamic phase
    Baum, BA
    Soulen, PF
    Strabala, KI
    King, MD
    Ackerman, SA
    Menzel, WP
    Yang, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2000, 105 (D9) : 11781 - 11792
  • [3] FRANCIS PN, 1995, J ATMOS SCI, V52, P1142, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<1142:SAOOTS>2.0.CO
  • [4] 2
  • [5] GAYET JF, 1995, P C CLOUD PHYS AM ME, P26
  • [6] Cloud thermodynamical phase classification from the POLDER spaceborne instrument
    Goloub, P
    Herman, M
    Chepfer, H
    Riedi, J
    Brogniez, G
    Couvert, P
    Séze, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2000, 105 (D11) : 14747 - 14759
  • [7] HOVENIER JW, 1983, ASTRON ASTROPHYS, V128, P1
  • [8] Identification of cloud phase from PICASSO-CENA lidar depolarization: a multiple scattering sensitivity study
    Hu, YX
    Winker, D
    Yang, P
    Baum, B
    Poole, L
    Vann, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE SPECTROSCOPY & RADIATIVE TRANSFER, 2001, 70 (4-6) : 569 - 579
  • [9] Color and polarization as indicators of comet dust properties and evolution in the near-nucleus coma
    Kolokolova, L
    Jockers, K
    Gustafson, BÅS
    Lichtenberg, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-PLANETS, 2001, 106 (E5) : 10113 - 10127
  • [10] KUNKEL KE, 1976, J ATMOS SCI, V33, P1772, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033<1772:MCAOMS>2.0.CO