Improving the care of patients with regard to chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis: The effect of feedback to clinicians on adherence to antiemetic prescribing guidelines

被引:58
作者
Mertens, WC
Higby, DJ
Brown, D
Parisi, R
Fitzgerald, J
Benjamin, EM
Lindenauer, PK
机构
[1] Baystate Med Ctr, Baystate Reg Canc Program, Div Hematol Oncol, Springfield, MA 01107 USA
[2] Baystate Med Ctr, Div Healthcare Qual, Springfield, MA 01107 USA
[3] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2003.08.118
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of performance and outcomes feedback on adherence to clinical practice guidelines regarding chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis (CINE). Methods: Institutional CINE clinical practice guidelines were developed based on American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines. Consecutive administrations of moderately/highly emetogenic chemotherapy were assessed for errors. Baseline statistical process control (SPC) charts were created and mean errors per administration were calculated. Prospective SPC charts were used to measure the effect of guideline development and distribution, a visiting lecturer, and ongoing feedback regarding compliance with guidelines employing SPC charts. Patients were surveyed regarding the extent and severity of CINE for 5 days postadministration. These outcomes were then shared with physicians. Results: Baseline compliance was poor (mean, 0.87 omissions per chemotherapy administration), largely because of inadequate adherence to recommendations for delayed CINE management. Most patients experienced delayed nausea, particularly on day 3 postchemotherapy. Physician prescribing performance did not undergo sustained improvement despite guideline development or distribution, a lecture by a visiting expert, or sharing of adherence data with clinicians. Once patient outcomes were shared, physicians accepted the need for compliance and instituted nurse practitioner antiemetic prescribing, with almost complete compliance and concurrent measurable reduction in day 3 nausea. SPC charts documented improvements in both outcomes. Conclusions: SPC charts effectively monitor ongoing compliance and patient symptoms and represent appropriate outcome measurement and change facilitation tools. However, physician participation in guideline development and evidence of poor compliance alone did not improve prescribing performance. Only evidence of patient CINE experience coupled with noncompliance improved results. (C) 2003 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:1373 / 1378
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Evidence of self-report bias in assessing adherence to guidelines [J].
Adams, AS ;
Soumerai, SB ;
Lomas, J ;
Ross-Degnan, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1999, 11 (03) :187-192
[2]   Delayed emesis induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: Do we need to treat all patients? [J].
Ballatori, E ;
Roila, F ;
DeAngelis, V ;
Riva, E ;
Barbieri, P ;
DelFavero, A ;
Basurto, C ;
Ciccarese, G ;
Palladino, MA ;
Mosconi, AM ;
Anastasi, P ;
Picciafuoco, M ;
Campora, E ;
Chiara, S ;
Cognetti, F ;
Ferraresi, V ;
Fabi, A ;
Tonachella, R ;
Cirulli, S ;
Sabbatini, R ;
Federico, M ;
Trassoldati, A ;
Silingardi, V ;
Donati, D ;
Maestri, A ;
Malacarne, P ;
Ricci, S ;
Antonuzzo, A ;
Allegrini, G ;
Conte, PF ;
Salvati, F ;
Nunziati, F ;
Antilli, A ;
Catalano, G ;
Cascinu, S ;
DiCostanzo, F ;
Tagliaventi, M ;
Zaniboni, A ;
Meriggi, F ;
Cortesi, E ;
Ramponi, S ;
Locatelli, MC ;
Santoro, A ;
Zucchinelli, P ;
Mantellini, E ;
Ferretti, G ;
Boni, C ;
Moretti, G ;
Scagliotti, G ;
Daniele, O .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1997, 8 (06) :561-567
[3]   Patients' estimation of overall treatment burden:: Why not ask the obvious? [J].
Bernhard, J ;
Maibach, R ;
Thürlimann, B ;
Sessa, C ;
Aapro, MS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (01) :65-72
[4]   Progress of clinical oncology guidelines development using the Practice Guidelines Development Cycle: The role of practitioner feedback [J].
Browman, GP ;
Newman, TE ;
Mohide, EA ;
Graham, ID ;
Levine, MN ;
Pritchard, KI ;
Evans, WK ;
Maroun, JA ;
Hodson, DI ;
Carey, MS ;
Cowan, DH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (03) :1226-1231
[5]   THE PRACTICE GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT CYCLE - A CONCEPTUAL TOOL FOR PRACTICE GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION [J].
BROWMAN, GP ;
LEVINE, MN ;
MOHIDE, EA ;
HAYWARD, RSA ;
PRITCHARD, KI ;
GAFNI, A ;
LAUPACIS, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (02) :502-512
[6]   Improving clinical practice guidelines for the 21st century - Attitudinal barriers and not technology are the main challenges [J].
Browman, GP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2000, 16 (04) :959-968
[7]   Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framewouk for improvement [J].
Cabana, MD ;
Rand, CS ;
Powe, NR ;
Wu, AW ;
Wilson, MH ;
Abboud, PAC ;
Rubin, HR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (15) :1458-1465
[8]  
*CASCC, ANN ONCOL, V9, P811
[9]   ON THE RECEIVING END PATIENT PERCEPTION OF THE SIDE-EFFECTS OF CANCER-CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
COATES, A ;
ABRAHAM, S ;
KAYE, SB ;
SOWERBUTTS, T ;
FREWIN, C ;
FOX, RM ;
TATTERSALL, MHN .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER & CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1983, 19 (02) :203-208
[10]   THE IMPACT OF READING ON PHYSICIANS NONADHERENCE TO RECOMMENDED STANDARDS OF MEDICAL-CARE [J].
COHEN, SJ ;
WEINBERGER, M ;
HUI, SL ;
TIERNEY, WM ;
MCDONALD, CJ .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1985, 21 (08) :909-914