Improving QPF by blending techniques at the Meteorological Service of Catalonia

被引:32
作者
Atencia, A. [1 ]
Rigo, T. [1 ]
Sairouni, A. [1 ]
More, J. [1 ]
Bech, J. [1 ]
Vilaclara, E. [1 ]
Cunillera, J. [1 ]
Llasat, M. C. [1 ]
Garrote, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Madrid, Dept Hydraul & Energy Engn, Madrid, Spain
关键词
NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION; CORRECTING DATA ASSIMILATION; PART I; HEAVY RAINFALL; RADAR; PRECIPITATION; VERIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; PROPAGATION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.5194/nhess-10-1443-2010
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The current operational very short-term and short-term quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) at the Meteorological Service of Catalonia (SMC) is made by three different methodologies: Advection of the radar reflectivity field (ADV), Identification, tracking and forecasting of convective structures (CST) and numerical weather prediction (NWP) models using observational data assimilation (radar, satellite, etc.). These precipitation forecasts have different characteristics, lead time and spatial resolutions. The objective of this study is to combine these methods in order to obtain a single and optimized QPF at each lead time. This combination (blending) of the radar forecast (ADV and CST) and precipitation forecast from NWP model is carried out by means of different methodologies according to the prediction horizon. Firstly, in order to take advantage of the rainfall location and intensity from radar observations, a phase correction technique is applied to the NWP output to derive an additional corrected forecast (MCO). To select the best precipitation estimation in the first and second hour (t+1 h and t+2 h), the information from radar advection (ADV) and the corrected outputs from the model (MCO) are mixed by using different weights, which vary dynamically, according to indexes that quantify the quality of these predictions. This procedure has the ability to integrate the skill of rainfall location and patterns that are given by the advection of radar reflectivity field with the capacity of generating new precipitation areas from the NWP models. From the third hour (t+3 h), as radar-based forecasting has generally low skills, only the quantitative precipitation forecast from model is used. This blending of different sources of prediction is verified for different types of episodes (convective, moderately convective and stratiform) to obtain a robust methodology for implementing it in an operational and dynamic way.
引用
收藏
页码:1443 / 1455
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Albers SC, 1996, WEATHER FORECAST, V11, P273, DOI 10.1175/1520-0434(1996)011<0273:TLAAPS>2.0.CO
  • [2] 2
  • [3] Forecasting weather radar propagation conditions
    Bech, J.
    Codina, B.
    Lorente, J.
    [J]. METEOROLOGY AND ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS, 2007, 96 (3-4) : 229 - 243
  • [4] Bech J., 2005, P 32 INT C RAD MET A
  • [5] BELLON A, 1999, INT C RAD MET 29 MON, P121
  • [6] Hydrological validation of a radar-based nowcasting technique
    Berenguer, M
    Corral, C
    Sánchez-Diezma, R
    Sempere-Torres, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2005, 6 (04) : 532 - 549
  • [7] A fuzzy logic technique for identifying nonprecipitating echoes in radar scans
    Berenguer, Marc
    Sempere-Torres, Daniel
    Corral, Carles
    Sanchez-Diezma, Rafael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 23 (09) : 1157 - 1180
  • [8] STEPS: A probabilistic precipitation forecasting scheme which merges an extrapolation nowcast with downscaled NWP
    Bowler, Neill E.
    Pierce, Clive E.
    Seed, Alan W.
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 132 (620) : 2127 - 2155
  • [9] Brewster KA, 2003, MON WEATHER REV, V131, P480, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<0480:PCDAAA>2.0.CO
  • [10] 2