Position in formal structure, personal characteristics and choices of advisors in a law firm: A logistic regression model for dyadic network data

被引:91
作者
Lazega, E [1 ]
vanDuijn, M [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV GRONINGEN,ICS,DEPT STAT & MEASUREMENT THEORY,NL-9712 TS GRONINGEN,NETHERLANDS
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0378-8733(97)00006-3
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
This paper presents a statistical model for the analysis of binary sociometric choice data, the p(2) model, which provides a flexible way for using explanatory variables to model network structure. It is applied to examine the influence of the formal structure of an organization on interactions among its members. It is shown to provide a general and precise method for addressing this substantive issue. We identify the respective effects of position in the formal structure (status, seniority, division of work and office membership) and selected personal characteristics of members of a corporate law firm on their choices of advisors. Flows of advice are shown to be consistently shaped by status games and the pecking order in the firm. Other dimensions help members in mitigating the effect of this strong rule. This approach ultimately provides more understanding of how members of such firms try to balance cooperation and competition in terms of access to and management of key resources. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 397
页数:23
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1983, BOUNDARY SPECIFICATI
[2]  
*APT SYST, 1994, GAUSS 3 0
[3]  
BAKER WE, 1992, NETWORKS ORG
[4]  
Blau P.M., 1964, SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEO
[5]  
Blau Peter M., 1963, FORMAL ORG COMP APPR
[6]   FORMAL ORGANIZATION - DIMENSIONS OF ANALYSIS [J].
BLAU, PM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1957, 63 (01) :58-69
[7]  
BURT RS, 1992, STRUCTURAL HOLES STU
[8]   MANAGING THROUGH NETWORKS IN INVESTMENT BANKING [J].
ECCLES, RG ;
CRANE, DB .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1987, 30 (01) :176-195
[9]   POWER-DEPENDENCE RELATIONS [J].
EMERSON, RM .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1962, 27 (01) :31-41
[10]  
Fienberg S. E., 1981, SOCIOL METHODOL, V12, P156, DOI DOI 10.2307/270741