Beyond Beliefs: Religions Bind Individuals Into Moral Communities

被引:465
作者
Graham, Jesse [1 ]
Haidt, Jonathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA
关键词
morality; religion; culture; well-being; group processes; SPIRITUALITY; GOD; ASSOCIATIONS; MOTIVATION; EVOLUTION; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1177/1088868309353415
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Social psychologists have often followed other scientists in treating religiosity primarily as a set of beliefs held by individuals. But, beliefs are only one facet of this complex and multidimensional construct. The authors argue that social psychology can best contribute to scholarship on religion by being relentlessly social. They begin with a social-functionalist approach in which beliefs, rituals, and other aspects of religious practice are best understood as means of creating a moral community. They discuss the ways that religion is intertwined with five moral foundations, in particular the group-focused "binding" foundations of Ingroup/loyalty, Authority/respect, Purity/sanctity. The authors use this theoretical perspective to address three mysteries about religiosity, including why religious people are happier, why they are more charitable, and why most people in the world are religious.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 150
页数:11
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
Anderson Bernhard., 1998, UNDERSTANDING OLD TE
[2]  
[Anonymous], UPANISHADS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, DARWINS CATHEDRAL EV
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Quran
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1965, FEM THEOR
[6]  
ATRAN S, 2009, EVOLUTION RELI UNPUB
[7]  
Barrett Justin., 2004, Why would anyone believe in God?
[8]  
Batson C.D., 1991, PSYCHOL INQ, V2, P107, DOI [DOI 10.1207/S15327965PLI0202_1, DOI 10.1207/S15327965PLI02021]
[9]   RELIGIOUS PRO-SOCIAL MOTIVATION - IS IT ALTRUISTIC OR EGOISTIC [J].
BATSON, CD ;
OLESON, KC ;
WEEKS, JL ;
HEALY, SP ;
REEVES, PJ ;
JENNINGS, P ;
BROWN, T .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 57 (05) :873-884
[10]   RELIGION AS PROSOCIAL - AGENT OR DOUBLE AGENT [J].
BATSON, CD .
JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF RELIGION, 1976, 15 (01) :29-45