Modeling riverine nitrate export from an East-Central Illinois watershed using SWAT

被引:71
作者
Hu, X.
McIsaac, G. E.
David, M. B.
Louwers, C. A. L.
机构
[1] Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Newmark Lab 4158, Urbana, IL USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Nat Resources & Environm Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq2006.0228
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Reliable water quality models are needed to forecast the water quality consequences of different agricultural nutrient management scenarios. In this study, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), version 2000, was applied to simulate streamflow, riverine nitrate (NO3) export, crop yield, and watershed nitrogen (N) budgets in the upper Embarras River (UER) watershed in east-central Illinois, which has extensive maize-soybean cultivation, large N fertilizer input, and extensive tile drainage. During the calibration (1994-2002) and validation (1985-1993) periods, SWAT simulated monthly and annual stream flows with Nash-Sutcliffe coefficients (E) ranging from 0.67 to 0.94 and R-2 from 0.75 to 0.95. For monthly and annual NO3 loads, E ranged from -0.16 to 0.45 and R-2 from 0.36 to 0.74. Annual maize and soybean yields were simulated with relative errors ranging from -10 to 6%. The model was then used to predict the changes in NO3 Output with N fertilizer application rates 10 to 50% lower than original application rates in UER. The calibrated SWAT predicted a 10 to 43% decrease in NO3 export from UER and a 6 to 38% reduction in maize yield in response to the reduction in N fertilizer. The SWAT model markedly overestimated NO3 export during major wet periods. Moreover, SWAT estimated soybean N fixation rates considerably greater than literature values, and some simulated changes in the N cycle in response to fertilizer reduction seemed to be unrealistic. Improving these aspects of SWAT could lead to more reliable predictions in the water quality outcomes of nutrient management practices in tile-drained watersheds.
引用
收藏
页码:996 / 1005
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1959, OPEN CHANNEL HYDRAUL
[2]   Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment - Part 1: Model development [J].
Arnold, JG ;
Srinivasan, R ;
Muttiah, RS ;
Williams, JR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 1998, 34 (01) :73-89
[3]   Estimating hydrologic budgets for three Illinois watersheds [J].
Arnold, JG ;
Allen, PM .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1996, 176 (1-4) :57-77
[4]   Regional estimation of base flow and groundwater recharge in the Upper Mississippi river basin [J].
Arnold, JG ;
Muttiah, RS ;
Srinivasan, R ;
Allen, PM .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2000, 227 (1-4) :21-40
[5]  
BURT CM, 2002, EVAPORATION IRRIGATE, P17
[6]  
Chu TW, 2004, T ASAE, V47, P1523, DOI 10.13031/2013.17632
[7]   Nitrogen balance in and export from an agricultural watershed [J].
David, MB ;
Gentry, LE ;
Kovacic, DA ;
Smith, KM .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1997, 26 (04) :1038-1048
[8]   Stream transport of herbicides and metabolites in a tile-drained, agricultural watershed [J].
David, MB ;
Gentry, LE ;
Starks, KM ;
Cooke, RA .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2003, 32 (05) :1790-1801
[9]  
Demissie M., 1996, ILLINOIS STATE WATER, V169
[10]  
Dingman S.L., 2002, Physical Hydrology, V2nd, p464 pp