Homoplasy and homology: Dichotomy or continuum?

被引:80
作者
Hall, Brian K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Biol, Halifax, NS B3H 4J1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
homoplasy; homology; convergence; parallelism; similarity; common descent;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.11.010
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
Homology is the presence of the same feature in two organisms whose most recent common ancestor also possessed the feature. I discuss the bases on which we can tell that two features being compared share sufficient elements of sameness to allow them to be treated as homologous and therefore to be legitimately compared with one another in a way that informs comparative, evolutionary, and phylogenetic analysis. To do so, I discuss the relationship(s) between homology and homoplasy to conclude that we are dealing neither with a dichotomy between homoplasy as parallelism/convergence and homology as common descent nor with a dichotomy of homoplasy as the interrupted presence of the character in a lineage and homology as the continuous presence of the character. Rather, we are dealing with common descent with varying degrees of modification. Homoplasy and homology are not dichotomies but the extremes of a continuum, reflecting deep or more recent shared ancestry based on shared cellular mechanisms and processes and shared genes and gene pathways and networks. The same genes can be used to initiate the development of homoplastic and homologous structures. Consequently, structures may be lost but their developmental bases retained, providing the potential for homoplasy. It should not be surprising that similar features persist when a feature is present in the nearest common ancestor (homology). Neither should it be surprising to find that different environments or selective pressures can trigger the reappearance of similar features in organisms that do not share a recent common ancestor (homoplasy). (c) 2007 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 479
页数:7
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Developmental genetics and homology: a hierarchical approach [J].
Abouheif, E .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1997, 12 (10) :405-408
[2]   Homology and developmental genes [J].
Abouheif, E ;
Akam, M ;
Dickinson, WJ ;
Holland, PWH ;
Meyer, A ;
Patel, NH ;
Raff, RA ;
Roth, VL ;
Wray, GA .
TRENDS IN GENETICS, 1997, 13 (11) :432-433
[3]   Lens induction by Pax-6 in Xenopus laevis [J].
Altmann, CR ;
Chow, RL ;
Lang, RA ;
HemmatiBrivanlou, A .
DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 1997, 185 (01) :119-123
[4]  
[Anonymous], HOMOLOGY HIERARCHICA
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, STRICKBERGERS EVOLUT
[6]  
[Anonymous], HOMOPLASY RECURRENCE
[7]   Segments, limbs, homology, and co-option [J].
Arthur, W ;
Jowett, T ;
Panchen, A .
EVOLUTION & DEVELOPMENT, 1999, 1 (02) :74-76
[8]   A MODEL FOR DEVELOPMENT AND EVOLUTION OF COMPLEX MORPHOLOGICAL STRUCTURES [J].
ATCHLEY, WR ;
HALL, BK .
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 1991, 66 (02) :101-157
[9]   How to identify (as opposed to define) a homoplasy: Examples from fossil and living great apes [J].
Begun, David R. .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN EVOLUTION, 2007, 52 (05) :559-572
[10]  
Bock G. R., 1999, Homology