A generic grouping algorithm and its quantitative analysis

被引:61
作者
Amir, A
Lindenbaum, M
机构
[1] IBM Corp, Almaden Res Ctr, San Jose, CA 95120 USA
[2] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Dept Comp Sci, IL-32000 Haifa, Israel
关键词
perceptual grouping; grouping analysis; graph clustering; maximum likelihood; Wald's SPRT; performance prediction; generic grouping algorithm;
D O I
10.1109/34.659934
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper presents a generic method for perceptual grouping and an analysis of its expected grouping quality. The grouping method is fairly general: It may be used for the grouping of various types of data features, and to incorporate different grouping cues operating over feature sets of different sizes. The proposed method is divided into two parts: constructing a graph representation of the available perceptual grouping evidence, and then finding the "best" partition of the graph into groups. The first stage includes a cue enhancement procedure, which integrates the information available from multifeature cues into very reliable bifeature cues. Both stages are implemented using known statistical tools such as Wald's SPRT algorithm and the Maximum Likelihood criterion. The accompanying theoretical analysis of this grouping criterion quantifies intuitive expectations and predicts that the expected grouping quality increases with cue reliability. It also shows that investing more computational effort in the grouping algorithm leads to better grouping results. This analysis, which quantifies the grouping power of the Maximum Likelihood criterion, is independent of the grouping domain. To our best knowledge, such an analysis of a grouping process is given here for the first time. Three grouping algorithms, in three different domains, are synthesized as instances of the generic method. They demonstrate the applicability and generality of this grouping method.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 185
页数:18
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
ADELSON EH, 1994, 279 MIT
[2]   Grouping-based nonadditive verification [J].
Amir, A ;
Lindenbaum, M .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1998, 20 (02) :186-192
[3]  
AMIR A, 1994, CIS9418 TECHN
[4]  
AMIR A, 1997, THESIS TECHNION IIT
[5]  
AMIR A, 1996, ECCV 96 CAMBR, V1, P371
[6]  
[Anonymous], SOURCEBOOK GESTAIT P
[7]  
BRAUTIGAM C, 1996, CVAP193 KTH
[8]   A BAYESIAN MULTIPLE-HYPOTHESIS APPROACH TO EDGE GROUPING AND CONTOUR SEGMENTATION [J].
COX, IJ ;
REHG, JM ;
HINGORANI, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER VISION, 1993, 11 (01) :5-24
[9]  
FRIDMAN JH, 1977, ACM T MATH SOFTWARE, V3, P209
[10]   BOUNDARY DETECTION BY CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION [J].
GEMAN, D ;
GEMAN, S ;
GRAFFIGNE, C ;
DONG, P .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1990, 12 (07) :609-628