Personality, media choice and political ideology: explaining ideological pluralism in China

被引:13
作者
Ma, Deyong [1 ]
Lewis, Orion A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Renmin Univ, Sch Int Studies, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Middlebury Coll, Polit Sci, Middlebury, VT 05753 USA
关键词
Authoritarian personality; political ideology; political attitudes; new media; media effects; authoritarian durability; state-society relations; Chinese public opinion; fragmented authoritarianism; internet sovereignty; COGNITIVE-STYLE; DELIBERATION; LINK; AUTHORITARIANISM; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1080/13510347.2019.1696775
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
To what extent do personality traits and media exposure explain political ideology? How important is authoritarian information control in structuring political attitudes relative to individual-level factors? This article evaluates the sources of political ideology using survey data from over 10,000 in internet users in China. Consistent with the literature, we find that both personality traits and media exposure are significantly associated with one's expressed ideological orientation. However prior individual-level personality traits appear to have a larger impact than information exposure and may cause citizens to self-select media information. This means that media effects have a differential impact on individuals, with authoritarian personalities being more prone to reinforce their views with propaganda. This research highlights important ways that personality mediates information exposure, helps to explain the micro-foundations that shape authoritarian control at an individual level, explains the efficacy of propaganda techniques, as well as the mechanisms of political pluralism under authoritarianism.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 546
页数:20
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Adorno T. W., 1950, AUTHORITARIAN PERSON
[2]   The other "authoritarian personality" [J].
Altemeyer, B .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 30, 1998, 30 :47-92
[3]  
Altemeyer B., 2007, THE AUTHORITARIANS
[4]   Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism [J].
Amodio, David M. ;
Jost, John T. ;
Master, Sarah L. ;
Yee, Cindy M. .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 10 (10) :1246-1247
[5]  
Bo Zhiyue., 2007, SERIES CONT CHINA
[6]   The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives: Personality Profiles, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave Behind [J].
Carney, Dana R. ;
Jost, John T. ;
Gosling, Samuel D. ;
Potter, Jeff .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 29 (06) :807-840
[7]  
Dahlberg L., 2001, Information Communication & Society, V4, P615, DOI 10.1080/13691180110097030
[8]   SHARED MENTAL MODELS - IDEOLOGIES AND INSTITUTIONS [J].
DENZAU, AT ;
NORTH, DC .
KYKLOS, 1994, 47 (01) :3-31
[9]  
Druckman JN, 2003, AM J POLIT SCI, V47, P729, DOI 10.1111/1540-5907.00051
[10]   Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of framing effects [J].
Druckman, JN .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2004, 98 (04) :671-686