Individual differences and undergraduate academic success: the roles of personality, intelligence, and application

被引:214
作者
Farsides, T [1 ]
Woodfield, R
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Social Psychol Grp, Sch Social Sci, Brighton BN1 9SN, E Sussex, England
[2] Univ Sussex, Sociol Grp, Sch Social Sci, Brighton BN1 9SN, E Sussex, England
关键词
personality; intelligence; application; motivation; academic success;
D O I
10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00111-3
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The roles of intelligence and motivation in predicting academic success are well established. Evidence is, however, mixed concerning the role of personality traits in predicting such success. The current study attempted to overcome various methodological limitations associated with many previous studies to examine the potency of the traits of the 'five factor model of personality' in predicting academic success up to 3 years later, both directly and when controlling for intelligence and 'application' (used as a proxy for motivation). Only two traits yielded significant zero-order correlations with eventual undergraduate success, with both Openness to experience and Agreeableness being positively associated with Final Grades. Openness to experience explained unique variance in Final Grades even when predicting in the company of intellect and application measures. The impact of Agreeableness on Final Grades was wholly mediated by the main application measure; namely, not missing seminars. Less than one fifth of Final Grade variance was explained by all the individual difference variables in combination. Several practical, theoretical, and future research implications are explored. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1225 / 1243
页数:19
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits [J].
Ackerman, PL ;
Heggestad, ED .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1997, 121 (02) :219-245
[2]  
[Anonymous], PSYCHOL BULL
[3]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[4]  
Blickle G, 1996, EUR J PERSONALITY, V10, P337
[5]  
CASSIDY T, 1989, J OCCUP PSYCHOL, V62, P301
[6]  
Collis J., 2001, INTELLIGENCE PERSONA
[7]  
Cooper C., 1998, Individual Differences
[8]  
Costa P.T., 1989, The NEO-PI / NEO-FFI manual supplement
[9]   4 WAYS 5 FACTORS ARE BASIC [J].
COSTA, PT ;
MCCRAE, RR .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1992, 13 (06) :653-665
[10]  
DeFruyt F, 1996, EUR J PERSONALITY, V10, P405, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199612)10:5<405::AID-PER255>3.0.CO