Photodynamic therapy using meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (Foscan®) for the treatment of vulval intraepithelial neoplasia

被引:37
作者
Campbell, SM [1 ]
Gould, DJ [1 ]
Salter, L [1 ]
Clifford, T [1 ]
Curnow, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Cornwall Hosp, Cornwall Dermatol Res Project, Truro TR1 3LJ, Cornwall, England
关键词
Foscan((R)); meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin; photodynamic therapy; vulval intraepithelial neoplasia;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06197.x
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has unique properties which make it suitable for the local treatment of superficial epithelial disorders; it has been suggested as a useful treatment for carcinoma in situ of the vulva. Objectives To evaluate the effect of the systemic photosensitizing agent meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC or temoporfin; Foscan(R), Biolitec, Edinburgh, U.K.) in vulval intraepithelial neoplasia type III (VIN III). Methods PDT using mTHPC was performed in six patients with VIN III. A dose of 0.1 mg kg(-1) body weight mTHPC was injected intravenously and the area of VIN irradiated 96 h later with 652-nm light from a diode laser. Patients were reviewed 1 week, 6 months and 2 years following treatment. Results Patients experienced only minimal pain from the initial treatment but two patients subsequently developed severe pain at the treated site for up to 2 weeks following PDT. All patients developed oedema and slough formation at the treated site and one patient developed cellulitis. At 6 months two patients had developed small recurrences of VIN at the original site and one patient had an area of VIN at a new site. These were treated either with further PDT or with a small excision. At 2 years there was no recurrence of VIN at the original site in all patients reviewed. Conclusions This small case series demonstrates that mTHPC-PDT is a useful initial treatment for VIN III. It is relatively selective, shows good cosmesis and conserves form and function. This is a major advantage over surgery. Repeat treatments are also possible, which is important in a condition such as VIN, which tends to be multifocal. Systemic mTHPC-PDT appears to have an advantage over topical 5-aminolaevulinic acid-PDT as the photosensitizer is distributed widely in areas of disease and consequently identifies foci which may not be apparent clinically but become evident when illuminated.
引用
收藏
页码:1076 / 1080
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Photodynamic therapy of early squamous cell carcinoma with tetra(m-hydroxyphenyl)chlorin: optimal drug-light interval
    AndrejevicBlant, S
    Hadjur, C
    Ballini, JP
    Wagnieres, G
    Fontolliet, C
    vandenBergh, H
    Monnier, P
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 76 (08) : 1021 - 1028
  • [2] HYDROPORPHYRINS OF THE MESO-TETRA(HYDROXYPHENYL)PORPHYRIN SERIES AS TUMOR PHOTOSENSITIZERS
    BONNETT, R
    WHITE, RD
    WINFIELD, UJ
    BERENBAUM, MC
    [J]. BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 1989, 261 (01) : 277 - 280
  • [3] Foscan® uptake and tissue distribution in relation to photodynamic efficacy
    Cramers, P
    Ruevekamp, M
    Oppelaar, H
    Dalesio, O
    Baas, P
    Stewart, FA
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 88 (02) : 283 - 290
  • [4] HOW DOES PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY WORK
    HENDERSON, BW
    DOUGHERTY, TJ
    [J]. PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY, 1992, 55 (01) : 145 - 157
  • [5] Hillemanns P, 2000, INT J CANCER, V85, P649, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(20000301)85:5<649::AID-IJC9>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-E
  • [7] Vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
    Jebakumar, S
    Woolley, PD
    Bhattacharyya, MN
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 1996, 7 (01) : 10 - 13
  • [8] Photodynamic therapy effect of m-THPC (Foscan®) in vivo:: correlation with pharmacokinetics
    Jones, HJ
    Vernon, DI
    Brown, SB
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 89 (02) : 398 - 404
  • [9] Jones RW, 2001, EUR J GYNAECOL ONCOL, V22, P393
  • [10] Single-episode photodynamic therapy and vulval intraepithelial neoplasia type III resistant to conventional therapy
    Kurwa, HA
    Barlow, RJ
    Neill, S
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2000, 143 (05) : 1040 - 1042