The mediation proportion - A structural equation approach for estimating the proportion of exposure effect on outcome explained by an intermediate variable

被引:207
作者
Ditlevsen, S
Christensen, U
Lynch, J
Damsgaard, MT
Keiding, N
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Social Med, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Epidemiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.ede.0000147107.76079.07
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
It is often of interest to assess how much of the effect of an exposure on a response is mediated through an intermediate variable. However, systematic approaches are lacking, other than assessment of a surrogate marker for the endpoint of a clinical trial. We review a measure of "proportion explained" in the context of observational epidemiologic studies. The measure has been much debated; we show how several of the drawbacks are alleviated when exposures, mediators, and responses are continuous and are embedded in a structural equation framework. These conditions also allow for consideration of several intermediate variables. Binary or categorical variables can be included directly through threshold models. We call this measure the mediation proportion, that is, the part of an exposure effect on outcome explained by a third, intermediate variable. Two examples illustrate the approach. The first example is a randomized clinical trial of the effects of interferon-a on visual acuity in patients with age-related macular degeneration. In this example, the exposure, mediator and response are all binary. The second example is a common problem in social epidemiology-to find the proportion of a social class effect on a health outcome that is mediated by psychologic variables. Both the mediator and the response are composed of several ordered categorical variables, with confounders present. Finally, we extend the example to more than one mediator.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 120
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
ARMINGER G, 1996, MECOSA 3 USER GUIDE
[2]  
Bartley M, 1998, SOCIOLOGY HLTH INEQU, P193
[3]  
Bollen K. A., 1989, Structural Equations with Latent Variables
[4]   Statistical methods for the evaluation of health effects of prenatal mercury exposure [J].
Budtz-Jorgensen, E ;
Keiding, N ;
Grandjean, P ;
Weihe, P ;
White, RF .
ENVIRONMETRICS, 2003, 14 (02) :105-120
[5]  
BUDTZJORGENSEN E, 2004, ENV HLTH
[6]   Criteria for the validation of surrogate endpoints in randomized experiments [J].
Buyse, M ;
Molenberghs, G .
BIOMETRICS, 1998, 54 (03) :1014-1029
[7]   Proposed Hostility and Pharisaic - Virtue Scales for the MMPI [J].
Cook, Walter W. ;
Medley, Donald M. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1954, 38 (06) :414-418
[8]  
COX DR, 1994, BIOMETRIKA, V81, P403, DOI 10.2307/2336971
[9]  
Everson SA, 1997, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V146, P142
[10]   STATISTICAL VALIDATION OF INTERMEDIATE END-POINTS FOR CHRONIC DISEASES [J].
FREEDMAN, LS ;
GRAUBARD, BI ;
SCHATZKIN, A .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1992, 11 (02) :167-178