Improving government policy on risk: Eight key principles

被引:49
作者
Aven, Terje [1 ]
Renn, Ortwin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
[2] IASS Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
关键词
COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS; DECISION-MAKING; BUSINESS PROCESS; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; SAFETY; UNCERTAINTIES; RESILIENCE; PRIORITIES; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2018.04.018
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper discusses the basic principles that a government should adopt when it comes to risk. There seems to be broad agreement about general principles, such as openness and transparency, involvement, proportionality and consistency, and making decisions based on evidence, but when it comes to a more detailed level, suitable principles are missing or are inconsistent. For example, what does it mean to base decisions on evidence or to act with proportionality when regulating or managing risk? The present paper aims at stimulating a discussion on this topic by formulating eight specific principles that governments should apply for the effective treatment of risk in society. The authors consider these eight principles to reflect current scientific knowledge produced by the risk analysis field, but like all principles of this type they are grounded in normative requirements of "good" governance. Several examples are used to illustrate the discussion.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 241
页数:12
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   ALARP and CBA all in the same game [J].
Ale, B. J. M. ;
Hartford, D. N. D. ;
Slater, D. .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2015, 76 :90-100
[2]  
Ale B.J.M., 2018, Medical Research Archives, V6, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, CURR WHO PHAS PAND A
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Risk governance
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, FDN RISK ANAL
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2001, GOVT RISK UNDERSTAND
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1992, SOCIAL THEORIES RISK
[8]   AUTO SAFETY REGULATION - AN ANALYSIS OF MARKET FAILURE [J].
ARNOULD, RJ ;
GRABOWSKI, H .
BELL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1981, 12 (01) :27-48
[9]  
Aven T., 2007, RISK MANAGEMENT
[10]  
Aven T, 2010, RISK MANAGEMENT RISK