Contract systems, bureaucracies, and faculty motivation - The probable effects of a no-tenure policy

被引:30
作者
Bess, JL [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, New York, NY 10003 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/2649180
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The apparently ineluctable movement in higher education from tenure-based employment systems to short-term contracts portends significant and deleterious changes in institutional cultures, faculty motivation, and faculty productivity. This article analyzes the motivational functions of tenure and reveals how contracts and associated bureaucracies will negatively affect faculty work.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / +
页数:23
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[2]   Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive [J].
Adler, PS ;
Borys, B .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1996, 41 (01) :61-89
[3]  
Adler PS, 1993, RES ORGAN BEHAV, P111
[4]   RATIONAL BEHAVIOR IN GROUPS - THE FREE-RIDING TENDENCY [J].
ALBANESE, R ;
VANFLEET, DD .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1985, 10 (02) :244-255
[5]  
ALPANDER GG, 1991, J MANAGEMENT DEV, V3, P13
[6]  
[Anonymous], COLL U ORG INSIGHTS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1960, E DURKHEIM 1858 1917
[8]  
[Anonymous], ACAD WORK CHANGING L
[9]  
[Anonymous], LEGALISTIC ORG
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1965, ORG PSYCHOL