Biochemical markers in oncology. Part I: Molecular basis. Part II: Clinical uses

被引:34
作者
Voorzanger-Rousselot, N.
Garnero, P.
机构
[1] SYNARC, F-69416 Lyon 03, France
[2] INSERM, U664, F-69008 Lyon, France
关键词
tumor markers; cancer; diagnosis; tumor recurrence; treatment monitoring;
D O I
10.1016/j.ctrv.2007.01.008
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The investigation of the molecular mechanisms involved in carcinogenesis and tumor progression has led to the development of numerous biochemical. markers. Biochemical markers may serve for early prediction of tumor recurrence, progression and development of metastases including bone metastases and for prediction of response to therapy. Tumor antigens have been used for more than a decade and although they have shown promising clinical results, their sensitivity and specificity remain limited. A tot of knowledge on the key molecules which control cell cycle, apoptosis and angiogenesis has been acquired during recent years, but their clinical value remains uncertain. Molecular markers which are linked to malignant transformation may provide a non-surgical therapeutic approach by targeting these molecules through gene therapy or antisense molecules. Because of the complexity of the physiopathogical processes involved in tumorogenesis and metastases, we first provide a review on the molecular basis of the various tumor markers and then discuss their potential clinical utility for the major cancers. The review of the current literature indicates that at the exception of a few examples, such as the use of Her-2 to predict response of the targeted Herceptin therapy, no single marker is sensitive and specific enough to perform an accurate diagnosis, predict disease progression or response to treatment. A combination of different biochemical and imaging markers appears to be the most promising strategy to monitor patients with cancer. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 283
页数:54
相关论文
共 754 条
[1]   Neuron-specific enolase, thymidine kinase, and tissue polypeptide-specific antigen in diagnosis and response to chemotherapy of small-cell lung cancer [J].
Abbasciano, V ;
Sartori, S ;
Trevisani, L ;
Nielsen, I ;
Ferrazzi, E ;
Bononi, A ;
Toso, S ;
Crepaldi, G ;
Bianchi, MP ;
Gilli, G ;
Zavagli, G .
CANCER DETECTION AND PREVENTION, 1999, 23 (04) :309-315
[2]  
ABE M, 1987, J IMMUNOL, V139, P257
[3]  
Abelev G I, 1971, Adv Cancer Res, V14, P295, DOI 10.1016/S0065-230X(08)60523-0
[4]   Comparison of five biochemical markers of bone resorption in multiple myeloma: elevated pre-treatment levels of S-ICTP and U-Ntx are predictive for early progression of the bone disease during standard chemotherapy [J].
Abildgaard, N ;
Brixen, K ;
Kristensen, JE ;
Eriksen, EF ;
Nielsen, JL ;
Heickendorff, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2003, 120 (02) :235-242
[5]  
ADOLPHS HD, 1984, UROL RES, V12, P125
[6]   Can the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction for prostate specific antigen and prostate specific membrane antigen improve staging and predict biochemical recurrence? [J].
Adsan, Ö ;
Cecchini, MG ;
Bisoffi, M ;
Wetterwald, A ;
Klima, I ;
Danuser, HJ ;
Studer, UE ;
Thalmann, GN .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 90 (06) :579-585
[7]   Plasma vascular endothelial growth factor levels have prognostic significance in patients with acute myeloid leukemia but not in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes [J].
Aguayo, A ;
Kantarjian, HM ;
Estey, EH ;
Giles, FJ ;
Verstovsek, S ;
Manshouri, T ;
Gidel, C ;
O'Brien, S ;
Keating, MJ ;
Albitar, M .
CANCER, 2002, 95 (09) :1923-1930
[8]   Transport and localization elements in myelin basic protein mRNA [J].
Ainger, K ;
Avossa, D ;
Diana, AS ;
Barry, C ;
Barbarese, E ;
Carson, JH .
JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1997, 138 (05) :1077-1087
[9]  
Aklilu F, 2000, CANCER RES, V60, P1753
[10]  
Albanell J, 1996, ANTICANCER RES, V16, P1027