Effects of the revised HCFA evaluation and management guidelines on inpatient teaching

被引:9
作者
Fihn, SD
Schleyer, AM
Kelly-Hedrick, H
Martin, DB
机构
[1] VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Ctr Excellence 152, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
medical education; teaching; Medicare;
D O I
10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.07001.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: In 1996, the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) introduced new evaluation and management (E&M) guidelines mandating more intensive supervision and documentation by attending physicians. We assessed the effects of the guidelines on inpatient teaching. DESIGN: Pretest-posttest, nonequivalent control group design. SETTING: A university hospital and an affiliated county hospital where the guidelines were implemented and an affiliated VA medical center where they were not. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-one full-time faculty who had attended on the general medical wards for at least 1 month for 2 of 3 consecutive years prior to July 1996 and for at least 1 month during the 18 following months. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We evaluated standardized, confidential evaluations of attending physicians that are routinely completed by residents and students after clinical rotations at all three sites. Comparing 863 evaluations completed before July 1, 1996 and 497 completed after that date, there were no significant differences at any of the hospitals on any items assessed. There were also no differences between the university and county hospitals as compared with the VA. Eighty-seven percent of 39 university and county attending physicians returned a survey about their perceptions of inpatient teaching activities before and after July 1, 1996. They reported highly significant increases in time devoted to attending responsibilities but diminished time spent on teaching activities. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians reported a dramatic increase in overall time spent attending but a decrease in time spent teaching following implementation of the revised E&M guidelines. Yet, evaluations of their teaching effectiveness did not change.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 456
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], DOC GUID EV MAN SERV
[2]  
CAMPBELL DT, 1996, EXPT QUASIEXPT DESIG
[3]  
Good P, 1994, PERMUTATION TESTS
[4]  
IRBY DM, 1987, J MED EDUC, V62, P1
[5]   Evaluation and management guidelines - Fatally flawed [J].
Kassirer, JP ;
Angell, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (23) :1697-1698
[6]   AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF ATTENDING ROUNDS [J].
MILLER, M ;
JOHNSON, B ;
GREENE, HL ;
BAIER, M ;
NOWLIN, S .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1992, 7 (06) :646-648
[7]   EVALUATION OF CLINICAL TEACHING BY GENERAL INTERNAL-MEDICINE FACULTY IN OUTPATIENT AND INPATIENT SETTINGS [J].
RAMSBOTTOMLUCIER, MT ;
GILLMORE, GM ;
IRBY, DM ;
RAMSEY, PG .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1994, 69 (02) :152-154
[8]   EVALUATING CLINICAL TEACHING IN THE MEDICINE CLERKSHIP - RELATIONSHIP OF INSTRUCTOR EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING SETTING TO RATINGS OF TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS [J].
RAMSEY, PG ;
GILLMORE, GM ;
IRBY, DM .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1988, 3 (04) :351-355
[9]   Attributes of excellent attending-physician role models [J].
Wright, SM ;
Kern, DE ;
Kolodner, K ;
Howard, DM ;
Brancati, FL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (27) :1986-1993