The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer

被引:1095
作者
Mandel, JS
Church, TR
Bond, JH
Ederer, F
Geisser, MS
Mongin, SJ
Snover, DC
Schuman, LM
机构
[1] Exponent, Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Environm & Occupat Hlth, Minneapolis, MN USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Biostat, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[5] Vet Affairs Hosp, Minneapolis, MN USA
[6] Emmes Corp, Potomac, MD USA
[7] Fairview Hosp, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJM200011303432203
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Both annual testing for fecal occult blood and biennial testing significantly reduce mortality from colorectal cancer. However, the effect of screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer remains uncertain, despite the diagnosis and removal of precancerous lesions in many persons who undergo screening. Methods: We have followed the participants in the Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study for 18 years. A total of 46,551 people, most of whom were 50 to 80 years old, were enrolled between 1975 and 1978 and randomly assigned to annual screening, biennial screening, or usual care (the control group). Those assigned to the screening groups were asked to prepare and submit two samples from each of three consecutive stools for guaiac-based testing. Those with at least one positive slide in the set of six were offered a diagnostic examination that included colonoscopy. Screening was conducted between 1976 and 1982 and again between 1986 and 1992. Study participants have been followed with respect to newly diagnosed cases of colorectal cancer and deaths. Follow-up has been more than 90 percent complete. Results: During the 18-year follow-up period, we identified 1359 new cases of colorectal cancer: 417 in the annual-screening group, 435 in the biennial-screening group, and 507 in the control group. The cumulative incidence ratios for colorectal cancer in the screening groups as compared with the control group were 0.80 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.70 to 0.90) and 0.83 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.73 to 0.94) for the annual-screening and biennial-screening groups, respectively. For both screening groups, the number of positive slides was associated with the positive predictive value both for colorectal cancer and for adenomatous polyps at least 1 cm in diameter. Conclusions: The use of either annual or biennial fecal occult-blood testing significantly reduces the incidence of colorectal cancer. (N Engl J Med 2000;343:1603-7.) (C) 2000, Massachusetts Medical Society.
引用
收藏
页码:1603 / 1607
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer - Can we afford to do this? [J].
Ahlquist, DA .
GASTROENTEROLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1997, 26 (01) :41-&
[2]   Reducing colorectal cancer mortality by repeated faecal occult blood test: a nested case-control study [J].
Bertario, L ;
Russo, A ;
Crosignani, P ;
Sala, P ;
Spinelli, P ;
Pizzetti, P ;
Andreola, S ;
Berrino, F .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 35 (06) :973-977
[3]  
BUSHHOUSE S, 1999, OCCURRENCE CANC MINN
[4]   Fecal occult blood screening in the Minnesota study: Sensitivity of the screening test [J].
Church, TR ;
Ederer, F ;
Mandel, JS .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1997, 89 (19) :1440-1448
[5]  
Conover W. J., 1980, PRACTICAL NONPARAMET
[6]  
CUTLER S J, 1958, J Chronic Dis, V8, P699, DOI 10.1016/0021-9681(58)90126-7
[7]  
*DAT AN PROD DIV, 1998, S PLUS 5 UNIX GUID S
[8]   RELATIVE SENSITIVITY OF THE FECAL OCCULT BLOOD-TEST AND FLEXIBLE SIGMOIDOSCOPY IN DETECTING POLYPS [J].
DEMERS, RY ;
STAWICK, LE ;
DEMERS, P .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1985, 14 (01) :55-62
[9]   SCREENING FOR COLORECTAL-CANCER IN A HIGH-RISK POPULATION - RESULTS OF A MATHEMATICAL-MODEL [J].
EDDY, DM ;
NUGENT, FW ;
EDDY, JF ;
COLLER, J ;
GILBERTSEN, V ;
GOTTLIEB, LS ;
RICE, R ;
SHERLOCK, P ;
WINAWER, S .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1987, 92 (03) :682-692
[10]   Colorectal cancer deaths as determined by expert committee and from death certificate: A comparison. The Minnesota Study [J].
Ederer, F ;
Geisser, MS ;
Mongin, SJ ;
Church, TR ;
Mandel, JS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 52 (05) :447-452