Solar energy prediction using linear and non-linear regularization models: A study on AMS (American Meteorological Society) 2013-14 Solar Energy Prediction Contest

被引:56
作者
Aggarwal, S. K. [1 ]
Saini, L. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] MM Engn Coll, Dept Elect Engn, Ambala 133203, Haryana, India
[2] Natl Inst Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Kurukshetra 136119, Haryana, India
关键词
Artificial neural network; Ensemble learning; Least square regression; Regularization; Solar energy forecasting; Variable segmentation; POWER PREDICTION; NEURAL-NETWORK; SELECTION; FORECASTS; SYSTEM; FUZZY; TERM;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2014.10.012
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In 2013, American Meteorological Society Committees on AI (artificial intelligence) Applications organized a short-term solar energy prediction competition aiming at predicting total daily solar energy received at 98 solar farms based on the outputs of various weather patterns of a numerical weather prediction model. In this paper, a methodology to solve this problem has been explained and the performance of ordinary LSR (least-square regression), regularized LSR and ANN (artificial neural network) models has been compared. In order to improve the generalization capability of the models, more experiments like variable segmentation, subspace feature sampling and ensembling of models have been conducted. It is observed that model accuracy can be improved by proper selection of input data segments. Further improvements can be obtained by ensemble of forecasts of different models. It is observed that the performance of an ensemble of ANN and LSR models is the best among all the proposed models in this work. As far as the competition is concerned, Gradient Boosting Regression Tree has turned out to be the best algorithm. The proposed ensemble of ANN and LSR model is able to show a relative improvement of 7.63% and 39.99% as compared to benchmark Spline Interpolation and Gaussian Mixture Model respectively. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 256
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Online short-term solar power forecasting [J].
Bacher, Peder ;
Madsen, Henrik ;
Nielsen, Henrik Aalborg .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2009, 83 (10) :1772-1783
[2]   Daily Solar Energy Estimation for Minimizing Energy Storage Requirements in PV Power Plants [J].
Beltran, Hector ;
Perez, Emilio ;
Aparicio, Nestor ;
Rodriguez, Pedro .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2013, 4 (02) :474-481
[3]  
Bishop C., 2006, PATTERN RECOGN, DOI DOI 10.1117/1.2819119
[4]  
Bishop ChristopherM., 2003, NEURAL NETWORKS PATT
[5]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[6]   Load forecasting using support vector machines: A study on EUNITE competition 2001 [J].
Chen, BJ ;
Chang, MW ;
Lin, CJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2004, 19 (04) :1821-1830
[7]  
Gomes da Silva LE, 2014, AMS 2013 2014 SOLAR
[8]   NOAA'S SECOND-GENERATION GLOBAL MEDIUM-RANGE ENSEMBLE REFORECAST DATASET [J].
Hamill, Thomas M. ;
Bates, Gary T. ;
Whitaker, Jeffrey S. ;
Murray, Donald R. ;
Fiorino, Michael ;
Galarneau, Thomas J., Jr. ;
Zhu, Yuejian ;
Lapenta, William .
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 94 (10) :1553-1565
[9]   Neural networks for short-term load forecasting: A review and evaluation [J].
Hippert, HS ;
Pedreira, CE ;
Souza, RC .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2001, 16 (01) :44-55
[10]   Solar Power Prediction Using Interval Type-2 TSK Modeling [J].
Jafarzadeh, Saeed ;
Fadali, M. Sami ;
Evrenosoglu, Cansin Yaman .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2013, 4 (02) :333-339