The Association Between Intentional Delay of Vaccine Administration and Timely Childhood Vaccination Coverage

被引:113
作者
Smith, Philip J. [1 ]
Humiston, Sharon G. [2 ]
Parnell, Trish [3 ]
Vannice, Kirsten S. [4 ]
Salmon, Daniel A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Natl Ctr Immunizat & Resp Dis, Atlanta, GA 30333 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Sch Med & Dent, Dept Emergency Med, Rochester, NY USA
[3] Parents Kids Infect Dis, Vancouver, WA USA
[4] Natl Vaccine Program Off, Washington, DC USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
UNITED-STATES; IMMUNIZATION; CHILDREN; MEASLES; EXEMPTIONS; INFANTS; ADULTS; RISK;
D O I
10.1177/003335491012500408
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives. We evaluated the association between intentional delay of vaccine administration and timely vaccination coverage. Methods. We used data from 2,921 parents of 19- to 35-month-old children that included parents' reports of intentional delay of vaccine administration. Timely vaccination was defined as administration with >= 4 doses of diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis; >= 3 doses of polio vaccine; >= 1 dose of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine; >= 3 doses of Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine; >= 3 doses of hepatitis B vaccine; and >= 1 dose of varicella vaccine by 19 months of age, as reported by vaccination providers. Results. In all, 21.8% of parents reported intentionally delaying vaccinations for their children. Among parents who intentionally delayed, 44.8% did so because of concerns about vaccine safety or efficacy and 36.1% delayed because of an ill child. Children whose parents intentionally delayed were significantly less likely to receive all vaccines by 19 months of age than children whose parents did not delay (35.4% vs. 60.1%, p<0.05). Parents who intentionally delayed were significantly more likely to have heard or read unfavorable information about vaccines than parents who did not intentionally delay (87.6% vs. 71.9%, p<0.05). Compared with parents who intentionally delayed only because their child was ill, parents who intentionally delayed only because of vaccine safety or efficacy concerns were significantly more likely to seek additional information about their decision from the Internet (11.4% vs. 1.1%, p<0.05), and significantly less likely to seek information from a doctor (73.9% vs. 93.9%, p<0.05). Conclusions. Intentionally delayed vaccine doses are not uncommon. Children whose parents delay vaccinations may be at increased risk of not receiving all recommended vaccine doses by 19 months of age and are more vulnerable to vaccine-preventable diseases. Providers should consider strategies such as educational materials that address parents' vaccine safety and efficacy concerns to encourage timely vaccination.
引用
收藏
页码:534 / 541
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Thimerosal exposure in infants and developmental disorders: A retrospective cohort study in the United Kingdom does not support a causal association [J].
Andrews, N ;
Miller, E ;
Grant, A ;
Stowe, J ;
Osborne, V ;
Taylor, B .
PEDIATRICS, 2004, 114 (03) :584-591
[2]   Coverage bias in traditional telephone surveys of low-income and young adults [J].
Blumberg, Stephen J. ;
Luke, Julian V. .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2007, 71 (05) :734-749
[3]   Reevaluating the Need for Concern Regarding Noncoverage Bias in Landline Surveys [J].
Blumberg, Stephen J. ;
Luke, Julian V. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 99 (10) :1806-1810
[4]  
BOOM JA, 2008, HLTH PROMOT PRA 1027
[5]   Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to improve vaccination coverage in children, adolescents, and adults [J].
Briss, PA ;
Rodewald, LE ;
Hinman, AR ;
Shefer, AM ;
Strikas, RA ;
Bernier, RR ;
Carande-Kulis, VG ;
Yusuf, HR ;
Ndiaye, SM ;
Williams, SM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2000, 18 (01) :97-140
[6]  
*CDCP US, 2010 CHILD AD IMM SC
[7]  
*CDCP US, VACC SAF INF PAR
[8]   Risk factors for delay in age-appropriate vaccination [J].
Dombkowski, KJ ;
Lantz, PM ;
Freed, GL .
PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2004, 119 (02) :144-155
[9]   Effective Strategies for Integrating Immunization Promotion Into Community Programs [J].
Findley, Sally E. ;
Sanchez, Martha ;
Mejia, Miriam ;
Ferreira, Richard ;
Pena, Oscar ;
Matos, Sergio ;
Stockwell, Melissa S. ;
Irigoyen, Matilde .
HEALTH PROMOTION PRACTICE, 2009, 10 (02) :128S-137S
[10]  
Grigg M. A., 2008, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V57, P893