Ethics, legal, social, counselling - Attitudes towards preconception sex selection: a representative survey from Germany

被引:11
作者
Dahl, E
Hinsch, KD
Brosig, B
Beutel, M
机构
[1] Univ Giessen, Ctr Dermatol & Androl, D-35385 Giessen, Germany
[2] Univ Giessen, Clin Psychosomat Med & Psychotherapy, D-35385 Giessen, Germany
关键词
preconception sex selection; public attitudes; social policy;
D O I
10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61767-1
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Within the next parliamentary term, the German government is expected to replace the current Embryo Protection Act with a new Human Reproductive Technology Act. Before introducing new legislation, policy makers may want to survey public attitudes towards novel applications of reproductive technology. In order to assess opinions and concerns about preconception sex selection for non-medical reasons, a social survey has been conducted in Germany. As a representative sample of the German population, 1005 men and women 18 years and older were asked whether or not preconception sex selection should be made available. Of the respondents, 32% held that sex selection should be strictly prohibited, be it for medical or non-medical reasons, and 54% accepted the use of preconception sex selection for medical purposes. Only a minority of 11% approved of the use of preconception sex selection for non-medical reasons. The widespread opposition to a freely available service for non-medical sex selection is based on several claims: 87% of respondents hold that 'children are a gift and deserve to be loved regardless of any characteristics such as beauty, intelligence or sex'; 79% argue that choosing the sex of children is 'playing God'; 76% are opposed because it is seen as 'unnatural'; 49% are afraid that it is 'skewing the natural sex ratio'; and 40% consider it to be 'sexist'.
引用
收藏
页码:600 / 603
页数:4
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
BEIER H, 2003, REPROD BIOMED ONLINE, V6, P91
[2]   The presumption in favour of liberty: a comment on the HFEA's public consultation on sex selection [J].
Dahl, E .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2004, 8 (03) :266-267
[3]   Preconception sex selection for non-medical reasons: a representative survey from Germany [J].
Dahl, E ;
Beutel, M ;
Brosig, B ;
Hinsch, KD .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 (10) :2231-2234
[4]  
HARRIS J, 2003, INDEPENDENT 1127, P19
[5]  
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, 2003, SEX SEL OPT REG REP
[6]   Sex selection, public policy and the HFEA's role in political decision making - response to Edgar Dahl's 'The presumption in favour of liberty' [J].
Pennings, G .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2004, 8 (03) :268-269
[7]   Gender variety as a valid choice: a comment on the HFEA - response to Edgar Dahl's 'The presumption in favour of liberty' [J].
Robertson, JA .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2004, 8 (03) :270-271
[8]   An attempted suppression of liberty [J].
Schulman, JD .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2004, 8 (04) :374-375
[9]   Sex selection, child welfare and risk: A critique of the HFEA's recommendations on sex selection [J].
Tizzard, J .
HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS, 2004, 12 (01) :61-68