A flexible architecture for autonomous agents

被引:17
作者
Das, SK
Fox, J
Elsdon, D
Hammond, P
机构
[1] UNIV LONDON IMPERIAL COLL SCI TECHNOL & MED, WILLIAM PENNEY LAB, LONDON SW7 2AZ, ENGLAND
[2] IMPERIAL CANC RES FUND, ADV COMPUTAT LAB, LONDON WC2A 3PX, ENGLAND
[3] INTEGRAL SOLUT LTD, BASINGSTOKE RG21 4RG, HANTS, ENGLAND
[4] BRUNEL UNIV, DEPT COMP SCI, UXBRIDGE UB8 3PH, MIDDX, ENGLAND
[5] UNIV LONDON QUEEN MARY & WESTFIELD COLL, DEPT COMP SCI, LONDON E1 4NS, ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1080/095281397146979
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A generic architecture for autonomous agents is presented. In common with other current proposals the agent is capable of reacting to and reasoning about events which occur in its environment, executing actions and plans in order to achieve goals in its environment, and communicating with other agents. The work described here proposes certain advances on other systems, notably the ability to reason about and make decisions under uncertainty, including decisions about competing beliefs and alternative actions. The framework is grounded in a non-classical decision model, the 'domino' model. This is formalized to ensure continuity with classical decision theory and avoid ad hoc features. The domino model is embodied in a well-defined knowledge representation language, (RL)-L-2, which explicitly supports the central concepts of decisions and plans, and associated constructs of goals, arguments, commitments, obligations and constraints. The availability of such a language provides a sound basis for building knowledge-based agents for practical applications. A major issue for such applications, however, is how to ensure their safe operation. This is a central issue whether the agents are used in an advisory role (e.g. decision support systems) or an autonomous one (e.g. in a robot). Techniques for explicit management of safety are described and some broader theoretical implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 440
页数:34
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] TOWARDS A GENERAL-THEORY OF ACTION AND TIME
    ALLEN, JF
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1984, 23 (02) : 123 - 154
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1993, REPRESENTING UNCERTA
  • [3] AQVIST I, 1985, EXTENSIONS CLASSICAL, V2, P605
  • [4] EDITORS INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIAL ISSUE ON LOGIC MODELING
    BHARGAVA, HK
    KIMBROUGH, SO
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 1994, 11 (02) : 101 - 102
  • [5] BONCZEK RH, 1981, F DECISION SUPPORT S
  • [6] *BTA, 1993, J BRIT THORATIC SOC, V48, P1
  • [7] Chellas BF, 1980, MODAL LOGIC
  • [8] CHEN Michael C, 1985, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, P205
  • [9] INTENTION IS CHOICE WITH COMMITMENT
    COHEN, PR
    LEVESQUE, HJ
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1990, 42 (2-3) : 213 - 261
  • [10] Das S. K., 1996, Practical Reasoning. International Conference on Formal and Applied Practical Reasoning, FAPR'96. Proceedings, P58, DOI 10.1007/3-540-61313-7_63