Diagnostic imaging for pancreatic cancer - Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography

被引:59
作者
Saisho, H [1 ]
Yamaguchi, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Chiba Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Med & Clin Oncol, Chiba, Japan
关键词
computed tomography; magnetic resonance imaging; positron emission tomography; magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography; pancreatic carcinoma; clinical staging of pancreatic carcinoma;
D O I
10.1097/00006676-200404000-00011
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) are sophisticated modalities typically used in the second-line diagnosis following routine clinical practice. Among them, CT is regarded as the standard imaging in diagnosing pancreatic cancer at present in Japan due to its popularity and reasonable reliability in wide-ranging diagnostic ability. However, even with multidetector row CT(MDCT), the demonstration of pancreatic cancer less than 1 cm in size remains nearly impossible. CT staging is considered accurate in one-half to two-thirds of patients, but limitations in the imaging of peripancreatic microinvasion and nodal or hepatic micrometastases still have a tendency to underestimate tumor extension. With recent advancement in imaging techniques, MRI has proven to be equal or superior to other imaging modalities in diagnosing pancreatic cancer. Most of all, it is expected that MRCP will become as effective an instrument as ultrasonography ( US) in the screening of pancreatic cancer. Functional imaging with PET using the glucose analog FDG can be used in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, but systemic or local disturbance of glucose metabolism may result in an incorrect diagnosis. The usefulness of PET is now considered in assessing tumor viability, monitoring tumor response to treatment, and detecting distant metastases.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 278
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   ERCP and MRCP - when and why [J].
Albert, JG ;
Riemann, JF .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 16 (03) :399-419
[2]   Results of positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-labelled fluorodeoxyglucose in staging and differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer [J].
Bares, R ;
Dohmen, BM ;
Cremerius, U ;
Fass, J ;
Teusch, M ;
Bull, U .
RADIOLOGE, 1996, 36 (05) :435-440
[3]   Current concepts - Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography [J].
Barish, MA ;
Yucel, EK ;
Ferrucci, JT .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (04) :258-264
[4]   MR cholangiopancreatography: Techniques and clinical applications [J].
Barish, MA ;
Soto, JA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (05) :1295-1303
[5]  
Calvo MM, 2002, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V97, P347
[6]  
Diederichs CG, 1998, J NUCL MED, V39, P1030
[7]   PANCREATIC DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA - DIAGNOSIS AND STAGING WITH DYNAMIC CT [J].
FREENY, PC ;
MARKS, WM ;
RYAN, JA ;
TRAVERSO, LW .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 166 (01) :125-133
[8]   THIN-SECTION CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY ACCURATELY PREDICTS THE RESECTABILITY OF MALIGNANT PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS [J].
FUHRMAN, GM ;
CHARNSANGAVEJ, C ;
ABBRUZZESE, JL ;
CLEARY, KR ;
MARTIN, RG ;
FENOGLIO, CJ ;
EVANS, DB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 167 (01) :104-113
[9]   SMALL PANCREATIC ADENOCARCINOMAS - EFFICACY OF MR-IMAGING WITH FAT-SUPPRESSION AND GADOLINIUM ENHANCEMENT [J].
GABATA, T ;
MATSUI, O ;
KADOYA, M ;
YOSHIKAWA, J ;
MIYAYAMA, S ;
TAKASHIMA, T ;
NAGAKAWA, T ;
KAYAHARA, M ;
NONOMURA, A .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 193 (03) :683-688
[10]   Prospective evaluation of pancreatic tumors:: Accuracy of MR imaging with MR cholangiopancreatography and MR angiography [J].
Hänninen, EL ;
Amthauer, H ;
Hosten, N ;
Ricke, J ;
Böhmig, M ;
Langrehr, J ;
Hintze, R ;
Neuhaus, P ;
Wiedenmann, B ;
Rosewicz, S ;
Felix, R .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (01) :34-41