Effective dose determination using an anthropomorphic phantom and metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for clinical adult body multidetector array computed tomography protocols

被引:65
作者
Hurwitz, Lynne M.
Yoshizumi, Terry T.
Goodman, Philip C.
Frush, Donald P.
Nguyen, Giao
Toncheva, Greta
Lowry, Carolyn
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ Hlth Syst, Radiat Safety Div, Durham, NC USA
关键词
computed tomography; radiation dosimetry;
D O I
10.1097/RCT.0b013e31802d3dd2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the organ doses and total body effective dose (ED) delivered to an anthropomorphic phantom by multidetector array computed tomography (MDCT) when using standard clinical adult body imaging protocols. Materials and Methods: Metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) technology was applied during the scanning of a female anthropomorphic phantom to determine 20 organ doses delivered during clinical body computed tomography (CT) imaging protocols. A 16-row MDCT scanner (LightSpeed, General Electric Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wis) was used. Effective dose was calculated as the sum of organ doses multiplied by a weighting factor determinant found in the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 60. Volume CT dose index and dose length product (DLP) values were recorded at the same time for the same scan. Results: Effective dose (mSv) for body MDCT imaging protocols were as follows: standard chest CT, 6.80 +/- 0.6; pulmonary embolus CT, 13.7 +/- 0.4; gated coronary CT angiography, 20.6 +/- 0.4; standard abdomen and pelvic CT, 13.3 + 1.0; renal stone CT, 4.51 + 0.45. Effective dose calculated by direct organ measurements in the phantom was 14% to 37% greater than those determined by the DLP method. Conclusions: Effective dose calculated by the DLP method underestimates ED as compared with direct organ measurements for the same CT examination. Organ doses and total body ED are higher than previously reported for MDCT clinical body imaging protocols.
引用
收藏
页码:544 / 549
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Utilization of radiology services in the United States: Levels and trends in modalities, regions, and populations [J].
Bhargavan, M ;
Sunshine, JH .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 234 (03) :824-832
[2]   Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Elliston, CD .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 232 (03) :735-738
[3]  
BRIGITTE AHA, 1995, CHEST, V107, P113
[4]   Effective doses in standard protocols for multi-slice CT scanning [J].
Cohnen, M ;
Poll, LW ;
Puettmann, C ;
Ewen, K ;
Saleh, A ;
Mödder, U .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (05) :1148-1153
[5]  
CRISTY M, 1987, SPECIFIC ADSORBED FR, V1, P56
[6]  
*DHHS, 1984, FED REGISTER, V49, P34698
[7]  
Dixon RL, 2003, MED PHYS, V30, P1272, DOI 10.1118/1.1576952
[8]  
*EUR COMM, 1999, 16262 EUR COMM OFF O
[9]   COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS FOR ASSESSING PATIENT DOSE FROM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
GELEIJNS, J ;
VANUNNIK, JG ;
ZOETELIEF, J ;
ZWEERS, D ;
BROERSE, JJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1994, 67 (796) :360-365
[10]   16-detector multislice CT: dosimetry estimation by TLD measurement compared with Monte Carlo simulation [J].
Groves, AM ;
Owen, KE ;
Courtney, HM ;
Yates, SJ ;
Goldstone, KE ;
Blake, GM ;
Dixon, AK .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2004, 77 (920) :662-665