Multiple social categorization

被引:244
作者
Crisp, Richard J. [1 ]
Hewstone, Miles
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Psychol, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Expt Psychol, Oxford OX1 3UD, England
来源
ADANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 39 | 2007年 / 39卷
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
REDUCING INTERGROUP BIAS; CROSSED-CATEGORIZATION; IN-GROUP; OUT-GROUP; POSITIVE AFFECT; PERCEIVED VARIABILITY; SUPERORDINATE GOALS; STEREOTYPE CONTENT; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; PERSON PERCEPTION;
D O I
10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39004-1
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Social categorization defines intergroup relations in ways that are not always simple and clear-cut, but often complex and multifaceted. There are diverse, overlapping, and interwoven ways in which we can describe ourselves and others: young, British, Asian, woman, Muslim, engineer, and so on. We know that which of these identities is used in person perception depends upon a variety of factors, including context and motivation; but also that identities are not mutually exclusive. We can be, and often are, identified and we identify others according to a combination of group memberships: a disabled athlete, a young Briton, a female engineer. Research on multiple social categorization has found that our many and varied, cross-cutting and convoluted, social identities have significant implications for understanding, and attenuating, prejudice and intergroup discrimination. This chapter reviews our own and others' research on multiple social categorization and discusses when and how different multiple categorization strategies can lead to more positive intergroup attitudes. We develop a model of the processes involved and explain how this work can help policy makers and practitioners in their efforts to promote, encourage, and enhance harmonious intergroup relations. © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 254
页数:92
相关论文
共 290 条
[1]   Exploring and evaluating school-based interventions to reduce prejudice [J].
Aboud, FE ;
Fenwick, V .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1999, 55 (04) :767-785
[2]  
Abrams D., 1998, GROUP PROCESS INTERG, V1, P7, DOI [10.1177/1368430298011002, DOI 10.1177/1368430298011002]
[3]  
Allen V.L., 1983, Studies in social identity, P92
[4]   CATEGORIZATION, BELIEF SIMILARITY, AND INTERGROUP DISCRIMINATION [J].
ALLEN, VL ;
WILDER, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 32 (06) :971-977
[5]  
Allport G. W., 1954, The Nature of Prejudice
[6]   3 PATTERNS OF SOCIAL CATEGORIZATION IN ATTRIBUTION MEMORY [J].
ARCURI, L .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 12 (03) :271-282
[7]   Shades of meaning: Skin tone, racial, attitudes, and constructive memory in African American children [J].
Averhart, CJ ;
Bigler, RS .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 67 (03) :363-388
[8]   Achieving stepfamily harmony: An intergroup-relations approach [J].
Banker, BS ;
Gaertner, SL .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 12 (03) :310-325
[9]  
Bargh J., 1997, ADV SOC COG, V10, P1
[10]   INDIVIDUAL CONSTRUCT ACCESSIBILITY AND PERCEPTUAL SELECTION [J].
BARGH, JA ;
PRATTO, F .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 22 (04) :293-311