Magnification survey and spot view mammography with a new microfocus X-ray unit: detail resolution and radiation exposure

被引:19
作者
Funke, M
Breiter, N
Hermann, KP
Oestmann, JW
Grabbe, E
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Dept Radiol, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ Gottingen, Inst Med Phys & Biophys, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
breast radiography; technology; breast neoplasms; calcification; radiation dose;
D O I
10.1007/s003300050399
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of our study was to evaluate a mammography unit capable of magnification of up to fourfold at an equivalent or lower dose than with current systems. A prototype mammography tube with an electron-beam-focusing technology resulting in a focal spot size of 40-120 mu m was combined with a highly intensifying screen-film system. To evaluate contrast-detail resolution, phantom radiographs were performed with the prototype magnification mammography system using a magnification factor of 1.7 for survey views and a magnification factor of 4.0 for spot views. They were compared with unmagnified survey views and magnification spot views (magnification factor 1.9) of a state-of-the-art mammography system. The radiation exposure was measured and mean glandular doses were calculated. The contrast-detail resolution with both prototype (m = 1.7) and conventional (m = 1.1) survey views was equivalent while the entrance dose and the mean glandular dose were approximately 50 % lower with the prototype. For spot views. the contrast-detail resolution was substantially higher or the prototype than for conventional magnification while the dose was equivalent. Dose reduction and improved detail resolution are possible with this new technology.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 390
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   MAGNIFICATION MAMMOGRAPHY - LOW-DOSE TECHNIQUE [J].
ARNOLD, BA ;
EISENBERG, H ;
BJARNGARD, BE .
RADIOLOGY, 1979, 131 (03) :743-749
[2]   REDUCED-DOSE MAGNIFICATION MAMMOGRAPHY [J].
BASSETT, LW ;
ARNOLD, BA ;
BORGER, D ;
EISENBERG, HC ;
GOLD, RH ;
MAHN, GR ;
HOLLAND, WP .
RADIOLOGY, 1981, 141 (03) :665-670
[3]  
BASSETT LW, 1992, RADIOL CLIN N AM, V30, P93
[4]   MONTE-CARLO CALCULATION OF CONVERSION FACTORS FOR THE ESTIMATION OF MEAN GLANDULAR BREAST DOSE [J].
DANCE, DR .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1990, 35 (09) :1211-1219
[5]  
DOI K, 1977, RADIOLOGY, V122, P479, DOI 10.1148/122.2.479
[6]   EVALUATION OF MAGNIFICATION AND PADDLE COMPRESSION TECHNIQUES IN THE ASSESSMENT OF MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING DETECTED ABNORMALITIES [J].
HAYES, R ;
MICHELL, M ;
NUNNERLEY, HB .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1991, 44 (03) :158-160
[7]  
KIMMESMITH C, 1992, WORKBOOK QUALITY MAM
[8]   ARTIFICIAL BONE EROSIONS - DETECTION WITH MAGNIFICATION RADIOGRAPHY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL HIGH-RESOLUTION RADIOGRAPHY [J].
LINK, TM ;
RUMMENY, EJ ;
LENZEN, H ;
REUTER, I ;
ROOS, N ;
PETERS, PE .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 192 (03) :861-864
[9]  
LINK TM, 1994, EUR RADIOL, V4, P341
[10]   NORMALIZED AVERAGE GLANDULAR DOSE IN MAGNIFICATION MAMMOGRAPHY [J].
LIU, B ;
GOODSITT, M ;
CHAN, HP .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 (01) :27-32