Photosynthetic responses to short-term and long-term light variation in Pinus sylvestris and Salix dasyclados

被引:13
作者
Hjelm, U
Ögren, E
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Forest Genet & Plant Physiol, S-90183 Umea, Sweden
[2] Umea Univ, Dept Plant Physiol, S-90187 Umea, Sweden
来源
TREES-STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION | 2004年 / 18卷 / 06期
关键词
leaf longevity; light-response; lightfleck; photoinhibition; photosynthetic acclimation;
D O I
10.1007/s00468-004-0329-8
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Pinus sylvestris and Salix dasyclados, which differ in leaf longevity, were compared with respect to four aspects of photosynthetic light use and response: high light acclimation, photoinhibition resistance and recovery, lightfleck exposure and use and chloroplast acclimation across leaves. The first two aspects were examined using seedlings under controlled conditions and the other two were tested using trees in the field. When exposed to high light, shade leaves of Pinus acclimated completely, achieving the same photosynthetic capacities as sun leaves, whereas shade leaves of Salix did not reach sun leaf capacities although the absolute magnitude of their acclimation was larger. Shade leaves of Pinus were also more resistant to photoinhibition than those of Salix. Much of the direct light supplied within the canopy was in the form of rapid fluctuations, lightflecks, for Pinus and Salix alike. They exploited short lightflecks with similar efficiency. The greater proportion of diffuse light in the canopy for Pinus than Salix seems to lead to a lesser degree of differential intra-leaf acclimation of chloroplasts, in turn leading to lower efficiency of photosynthesis under unilateral light as reflected by a lower convexity, rate of bending, of the light-response curve. The differences in light use and responses are discussed in relation to possible differences in characteristics of the long and short-lived leaf.
引用
收藏
页码:622 / 629
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   COPPER ENZYMES IN ISOLATED CHLOROPLASTS - POLYPHENOLOXIDASE IN BETA-VULGARIS [J].
ARNON, DI .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1949, 24 (01) :1-15
[2]  
BRADSHAW A. D., 1965, ADVANCE GENET, V13, P115, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60048-6
[3]   THE ECOLOGY OF LEAF LIFE SPANS [J].
CHABOT, BF ;
HICKS, DJ .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1982, 13 :229-259
[5]   COMPARISON OF THE EFFECT OF EXCESSIVE LIGHT ON CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE (77K) AND PHOTON YIELD OF O-2 EVOLUTION IN LEAVES OF HIGHER-PLANTS [J].
DEMMIG, B ;
BJORKMAN, O .
PLANTA, 1987, 171 (02) :171-184
[6]   PHOTOPROTECTION AND OTHER RESPONSES OF PLANTS TO HIGH LIGHT STRESS [J].
DEMMIGADAMS, B ;
ADAMS, WW .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1992, 43 :599-626
[7]  
Gamper R, 2000, PHOTOSYNTHETICA, V38, P373, DOI 10.1023/A:1010965319054
[8]   THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE QUANTUM YIELD OF PHOTOSYNTHETIC ELECTRON-TRANSPORT AND QUENCHING OF CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE [J].
GENTY, B ;
BRIANTAIS, JM ;
BAKER, NR .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, 1989, 990 (01) :87-92
[9]   Effects of nutrient supply on photosynthetic acclimation and photoinhibition of one-year-old foliage of Picea abies [J].
Grassi, G ;
Colom, MR ;
Minotta, G .
PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2001, 111 (02) :245-254
[10]   RELATIVE GROWTH-RATE - ITS RANGE AND ADAPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE IN A LOCAL FLORA [J].
GRIME, JP ;
HUNT, R .
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1975, 63 (02) :393-422