Uncertainty in Scatterometer-Derived Vorticity

被引:26
作者
Bourassa, Mark A. [1 ]
Ford, Kelly McBeth
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, COAPS, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
WIND-SPEED; SEAWINDS; VALIDATION; MAGNITUDE; OCEAN;
D O I
10.1175/2009JTECHO689.1
中图分类号
P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
A more versatile and robust technique is developed for determining area-averaged surface vorticity based on vector winds from swaths of remotely sensed wind vectors. This technique could also be applied to determine the curl of stress, and it could be applied to any gridded dataset of winds or stresses. The technique is discussed in detail and compared to two previous studies that focused on early development of tropical systems. Error characteristics of the technique are examined in detail. Specifically, three independent sources of error are explored: random observational error, truncation error, and representation error. Observational errors are due to random errors in the wind observations and determined as a worst-case estimate as a function of averaging spatial scale. The observational uncertainty in the Quick Scatterometer (QuikSCAT)-derived vorticity averaged for a roughly circular shape with a 100-km diameter, expressed as one standard deviation, is approximately 0.5 x 10(-5) s(-1) for the methodology described herein. Truncation error is associated with the assumption of linear changes between wind vectors. Uncertainty related to truncation has more spatial organization in QuikSCAT data than observational uncertainty. On 25- and 50-km scales, the truncation errors are very large. The third type of error, representation error, is due to the size of the area being averaged compared to values with 25-km length scales. This type of error is analogous to oversmoothing. Tropical and subtropical low pressure systems from three months of QuikSCAT observations are used to examine truncation and representation errors. Representation error results in a bias of approximately -1.5 x 10(-5) s(-1) for area-averaged vorticity calculated on a 100-km scale compared to vorticity calculated on a 25-km scale. The discussion of these errors will benefit future projects of this nature as well as future satellite missions.
引用
收藏
页码:594 / 603
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1982, INTRO ERROR ANAL, DOI DOI 10.1119/1.13309
  • [2] SeaWinds validation with research vessels
    Bourassa, MA
    Legler, DM
    O'Brien, JJ
    Smith, SR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2003, 108 (C2)
  • [3] Simultaneous wind and rain retrieval using SeaWinds data
    Draper, DW
    Long, DG
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 42 (07): : 1411 - 1423
  • [4] Ebuchi N, 2002, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V19, P2049, DOI 10.1175/1520-0426(2002)019<2049:EOWVOB>2.0.CO
  • [5] 2
  • [6] The accuracy of preliminary WindSat vector wind measurements: comparisons with NDBC buoys and QuikSCAT
    Freilich, MH
    Vanhoff, BA
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2006, 44 (03): : 622 - 637
  • [7] Freilich MH, 1997, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V14, P695, DOI 10.1175/1520-0426(1997)014<0695:VOVMDE>2.0.CO
  • [8] 2
  • [9] Freilich MH, 2003, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V20, P549, DOI 10.1175/1520-0426(2003)20<549:TRBWSR>2.0.CO
  • [10] 2