Nuclear energy consumption and economic growth in nine developed countries

被引:107
作者
Wolde-Rufael, Yemane [1 ]
Menyah, Kojo [1 ]
机构
[1] London Metropolitan Univ, London Metropolitan Business Sch, London EC2M 6SQ, England
关键词
Nuclear energy consumption; Economic growth; Causality; Variance decomposition; CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP; PANEL; INCOME; GDP;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2010.01.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article attempts to test the causal relationship between nuclear energy consumption and real GDP for nine developed countries for the period 1971-2005 by including capital and labour as additional variables. Using a modified version of the Granger causality test developed by Toda and Yamamoto (1995), we found a unidirectional causality running from nuclear energy consumption to economic growth in Japan, Netherlands and Switzerland; the opposite uni-directional causality running from economic growth to nuclear energy consumption in Canada and Sweden; and a bi-directional causality running between economic growth and nuclear energy consumption in France, Spain, the United Kingdom and the United States. In Spain, the United Kingdom and the USA, increases in nuclear energy consumption caused increases in economic growth implying that conservation measures taken that reduce nuclear energy consumption may negatively affect economic growth. In France, Japan, Netherlands and Switzerland increases in nuclear energy consumption caused decreases in economic growth, suggesting that energy conservation measure taken that reduce nuclear energy consumption may help to mitigate the adverse effects of nuclear energy consumption on economic growth. In Canada and Sweden energy conservation measures affecting nuclear energy consumption may not harm economic growth. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:550 / 556
页数:7
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Abdulnasser H.-J., 2000, Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, V9, P355, DOI [DOI 10.1080/09638190050086195, 10.1080/09638190050086195]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, CONS SUBS FOSS FUELS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, ORG EC COOP DEV NUCL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, STAT REV WORLD EN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, World Development Indicators
[6]  
APERGIS N, 2009, CAUSAL DYNAMICS COAL
[7]   A panel study of nuclear energy consumption and economic growth [J].
Apergis, Nicholas ;
Payne, James E. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2010, 32 (03) :545-549
[8]  
Becker G., 2005, NUCL POWER HAS ITS T
[9]  
BOWDEN N, ENERGY SO B IN PRESS
[10]   The causal relationship between US energy consumption and real output: A disaggregated analysis [J].
Bowden, Nicholas ;
Payne, James E. .
JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 2009, 31 (02) :180-188