Effect of Local Cultural Context on the Success of Community-Based Conservation Interventions

被引:196
作者
Waylen, Kerry A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fischer, Anke [3 ]
McGowan, Philip J. K. [4 ]
Thirgood, Simon J. [3 ]
Milner-Gulland, E. J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Ctr Environm Policy, Ascot SL5 7PY, Berks, England
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Life Sci, Ascot SL5 7PY, Berks, England
[3] Macaulay Land Use Res Inst, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, Scotland
[4] Newcastle Univ, Biol Field Stn, World Pheasant Assoc, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE15 0HT, Tyne & Wear, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
community conservation; conservation and development; ICDP; institutions; participation; NATURAL-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; INTEGRATED CONSERVATION; IMPLEMENTATION; PARTICIPATION; AGREEMENT; FORESTRY; RESERVE; AFRICA;
D O I
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01446.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Conservation interventions require evaluation to understand what factors predict success or failure. To date, there has been little systematic investigation of the effect of social and cultural context on conservation success, although a large body of literature argues it is important. We investigated whether local cultural context, particularly local institutions and the efforts of interventions to engage with this culture significantly influence conservation outcomes. We also tested the effects of community participation, conservation education, benefit provision, and market integration. We systematically reviewed the literature on community-based conservation and identified 68 interventions suitable for inclusion. We used a protocol to extract and code information and evaluated a range of measures of outcome success (attitudinal, behavioral, ecological, and economic). We also examined the association of each predictor with each outcome measure and the structure of predictor covariance. Local institutional context influenced intervention outcomes, and interventions that engaged with local institutions were more likely to succeed. Nevertheless, there was limited support for the role of community participation, conservation education, benefit provision, and market integration on intervention success. We recommend that conservation interventions seek to understand the societies they work with and tailor their activities accordingly. Systematic reviews are a valuable approach for assessing conservation evidence, although sensitive to the continuing lack of high-quality reporting on conservation interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:1119 / 1129
页数:11
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Adams J, 2002, CONSERV ECOL, V6
[2]  
Adams WM, 2001, ORYX, V35, P193, DOI 10.1017/S0030605300031847
[3]   Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Gibson, CC .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1999, 27 (04) :629-649
[4]  
Agresti A., 2002, CATEGORICAL DATA ANA, DOI [10.1002/0471249688, DOI 10.1002/0471249688]
[5]   Integrated conservation and development projects - Examples from Africa [J].
Alpert, P .
BIOSCIENCE, 1996, 46 (11) :845-855
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Foundations of Sociology
[7]  
[Anonymous], NONPARAMETRIC STAT L
[8]  
[Anonymous], IRR PACKAGE R VARIOU
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2007, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[10]  
Barrett CB, 2001, BIOSCIENCE, V51, P497, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0497:CTBAWI]2.0.CO