Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration

被引:663
作者
Mittenberg, W [1 ]
Patton, C [1 ]
Canyock, EM [1 ]
Condit, DC [1 ]
机构
[1] Nova SE Univ, Ctr Psychol Studies, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33314 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1076/jcen.24.8.1094.8379
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Base rates of probable malingering and symptom exaggeration are reported from a survey of the American Board of Clinical Neuropsychology membership. Estimates were based on 33,531 annual cases involved in personal injury. (n=6,371), disability (n=3,688). criminal (n=1,341) or medical (n=22,131) matters, Base rates did not differ among geographic regions or practice settings, but were related to the proportion of plaintiff versus defence referrals. Reported rates would be 2-4% higher if variance due to referral source was controlled. Twenty-nine percent of personal injury, 30% of disability, 19% of criminal, and 8% of medical cases involved probable malingering and symptom exaggeration. Thirty-nine percent of mild head injury, 35% of fibromyalgia/chronic fatigue, 31% of chronic pain, 27% of neurotoxic, and 22% of electrical injury claims resulted in diagnostic impressions of probable malingering. Diagnosis was supported by multiple sources of evidence. including severity (65% of cases) or pattern (64% of cases) of cognitive impairment that was inconsistent with the condition, scores below empirical cutoff's on forced choice tests (57% of cases). discrepancies among records. self-report, and observed behavior (56%) implausible self-reported symptoms in interview (46%), implausible changes in test scores across repeated examination (45%), and validity scales on objective personality tests (38% of cases).
引用
收藏
页码:1094 / 1102
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], J FORENSIC NEUROPSYC, DOI DOI 10.1300/J151v02n02_01
  • [2] [Anonymous], PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT
  • [3] Symptom validity testing: A critical review
    Bianchini, KJ
    Mathias, CW
    Greve, KW
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2001, 15 (01) : 19 - 45
  • [4] A review of mild head trauma .1. Meta-analytic review of neuropsychological studies
    Binder, LM
    Rohling, ML
    Larrabee, GJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 19 (03) : 421 - 431
  • [5] BINDER LM, 1996, ASSESSMENT, V3, P403, DOI DOI 10.1177/107319119600300405
  • [6] CULLUM CM, 1991, FORENSIC NEUROPSYCHO, P141
  • [7] Discrepancy between predicted and obtained WAIS-R IQ scores discriminates between traumatic brain injury and insufficient effort
    Demakis, GJ
    Sweet, JJ
    Sawyer, TP
    Moulthrop, M
    Nies, K
    Clingerman, S
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2001, 13 (02) : 240 - 248
  • [8] Practices in forensic neuropsychology: Perspectives of neuropsychologists and trial attorneys
    Essig, SM
    Mittenberg, W
    Petersen, RS
    Strauman, S
    Cooper, JT
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 16 (03) : 271 - 291
  • [9] Mixed group validation: A method to address the limitations of criterion group validation in research on malingering detection
    Frederick, RI
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES & THE LAW, 2000, 18 (06) : 693 - 718
  • [10] Gervais RO, 2001, J RHEUMATOL, V28, P1892