Normal and hearing-impaired word recognition scores for monosyllabic words in quiet and noise

被引:25
作者
Beattie, RC
Barr, T
Roup, C
机构
[1] Department of Communicative Disorders, California State University, Long Beach, Long Beach, CA
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY | 1997年 / 31卷 / 03期
关键词
speech in noise; word recognition; hearing impaired;
D O I
10.3109/03005364000000018
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
The effects of noise on word recognition scores were assessed with normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Fifty-one normal-hearing subjects were tested at 50 dB HL using signal-to-noise ratios (S/Ns) of 5, 10, and 15 dB. Thirty subjects with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing losses were tested in quiet and in noise at S/Ns of IO dB and 15 dB. Monosyllabic words in a Multitalker Noise were selected for testing. Mean scores for the normal-hearing subjects were 45% at the 5 dB S/N, 74% at the 10 dB S/N, and 87% at the 15 dB S/N. For the hearing-impaired subjects, scores were 85% in quiet, 60% at the 15 dB S/N, and 40% at the 10 dB S/N. These results suggest that background noise which is mildly disruptive for normal hearing subjects can be highly disruptive to hearing-impaired subjects. Moreover, these findings indicate that subjects with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss require a more favourable S/N than normal listeners to achieve comparable word recognition scores. Test-retest differences for word recognition scores revealed variability that agreed closely with predictions based on the binomial distribution for both groups of subjects. Speech-in-noise abilities must be measured directly because regression equations revealed that speech-in-noise scores cannot be predicted accurately from either puretone thresholds or speech-in-quiet scores. Word recognition functions are presented from several hearing-impaired subjects and demonstrate the value of testing in noise.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 164
页数:12
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, S361989 ANSI
[2]   RELIABILITY OF THRESHOLD, SLOPE, AND PB MAX FOR MONOSYLLABIC WORDS [J].
BEATTIE, RC ;
RAFFIN, MJM .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1985, 50 (02) :166-178
[3]  
BEATTIE RC, 1982, AM J OTOL, V3, P353
[4]   COMPARISON OF AUDITEC OF ST-LOUIS CASSETTE RECORDINGS OF NU-6 AND CID W-22 ON A NORMAL-HEARING POPULATION [J].
BEATTIE, RC ;
EDGERTON, BJ ;
SVIHOVEC, DV .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1977, 42 (01) :60-64
[5]   RANGE OF INTENSITIES YIELDING PB MAX AND THE THRESHOLD FOR MONOSYLLABIC WORDS FOR HEARING-IMPAIRED SUBJECTS [J].
BEATTIE, RC ;
ZIPP, JA .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1990, 55 (03) :417-426
[6]   LOUDNESS DISCOMFORT LEVEL FOR SPEECH - COMPARISON OF 2 INSTRUCTIONAL SETS FOR SATURATION SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL SELECTION [J].
BEATTIE, RC ;
SVIHOVEC, DA ;
CARMEN, RE ;
KUNKEL, HA .
EAR AND HEARING, 1980, 1 (04) :197-205
[7]   WORD RECOGNITION FUNCTIONS FOR THE CID W-22 TEST IN MULTITALKER NOISE FOR NORMALLY HEARING AND HEARING-IMPAIRED SUBJECTS [J].
BEATTIE, RC .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1989, 54 (01) :20-32
[8]  
BERGER KW, 1980, PRESCRIPTION HEARING
[9]  
CARHART R, 1970, ARCHIV OTOLARYNGOL, V91, P273
[10]  
CARHART R, 1965, INT AUDIOL, V4, P5