Blood and body fluid exposure risks among health care workers: Results from the Duke Health and Safety Surveillance System

被引:101
作者
Dement, JM [1 ]
Epling, C [1 ]
Ostbye, T [1 ]
Pompeii, LA [1 ]
Hunt, DL [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Community & Family Med, Div Environm & Occupat Med, Durham, NC 27705 USA
关键词
blood; body fluids; blood-borne pathogens; needle stick; health care workers; surveillance;
D O I
10.1002/ajim.20106
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Health care workers (HCWs) are at risk of exposures to human blood and body fluids (BBF). Needlestick injuries and splashes place HCWs at risk for numerous blood-borne infections including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B (HBV), and hepatitis C (HCV). Utilizing a new comprehensive occupational health surveillance system, the objective of this research was to better define the BBF exposure risk and risk factors among employees of a large tertiary medical center Methods A population of 24,425 HCWs employed in jobs with potential BBF exposures was followed for BBF exposure events from 1998 to 2002. BBF exposure rates were calculated for strata defined by age, race, gender occupation, work location, and duration of employment. Poisson regression was used for detailed analyses of risk factors for BBF exposure. Results The study population reported 2,730 BBF exposures during the study period, resulting in an overall annual rate of 5.5 events/100 FTEs and a rate of 3.9 for percutaneous exposures. Higher rates were observed for males, persons employed less than 4 years, Hispanic employees, and persons less than 45 years of age. Much higher rates were observed for house staff, nurse anesthetists, inpatient nurses, phlebotomists, and surgical/operating room technicians. Poisson regression results strengthened and extended results from stratified analyses. Rates of percutaneous exposures from hollow needles were found to decrease over the study period; however, exposure rates from suture needles appear to be increasing. Conclusion While continued training efforts need to be directed toward new HCWs, our data also suggest that employees who have been in their job 1-4 years continue to be at higher risk of BBF exposures. This research also points to the need for better safety devices/products and work practices to reduce suture-related injuries. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 648
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Hospital nurses' occupational exposure to blood: Prospective, retrospective, and institutional reports [J].
Aiken, LH ;
Sloane, DM ;
Klocinski, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1997, 87 (01) :103-107
[2]  
Alter M J, 1997, Clin Liver Dis, V1, P559, DOI 10.1016/S1089-3261(05)70321-4
[3]   TEMPORAL ASSOCIATION BETWEEN IMPLEMENTATION OF UNIVERSAL PRECAUTIONS AND A SUSTAINED, PROGRESSIVE DECREASE IN PERCUTANEOUS EXPOSURES TO BLOOD [J].
BEEKMANN, SE ;
VLAHOV, D ;
KOZIOL, DE ;
MCSHALLEY, ED ;
SCHMITT, JM ;
HENDERSON, DK .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1994, 18 (04) :562-569
[4]   Hospital bloodborne pathogens programs: Program characteristics and blood and body fluid exposure rates [J].
Beekmann, SE ;
Vaughn, TE ;
McCoy, KD ;
Ferguson, KJ ;
Torner, JC ;
Woolson, RF ;
Doebbeling, BN .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 22 (02) :73-82
[5]  
*BLS, 2002, HEALTHC WORK FACTS
[6]  
Campbell SR, 2000, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V21, P107
[7]  
Centers for Disease Control, 1987, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V36, p1S
[8]  
*CTR DIS CONTR PRE, 1995, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V44, P929
[9]   An integrated comprehensive occupational surveillance system for health care workers [J].
Dement, JM ;
Pompeii, LA ;
Ostbye, T ;
Epling, C ;
Lipscomb, HJ ;
James, T ;
Jacobs, MJ ;
Jackson, G ;
Thomann, W .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 2004, 45 (06) :528-538
[10]   Risk of occupational blood exposure in a cohort of 24,000 hospital healthcare workers: Position and environment analysis over three years [J].
Denis, MA ;
Ecochard, R ;
Bernadet, A ;
Forissier, MF ;
Porst, JM ;
Robert, O ;
Volckmann, C ;
Bergeret, A .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2003, 45 (03) :283-288