Reporting point and interval estimates of effect-size for planned contrasts: fixed within effect analyses of variance

被引:25
作者
Robey, RR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA
关键词
effect-size; confidence interval; clinical significance;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfludis.2004.10.005
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
The purpose of this tutorial is threefold: (a) review the state of statistical science regarding effect-sizes, (b) illustrate the importance of effect-sizes for interpreting findings in all forms of research and particularly for results of clinical-outcome research, and (c) demonstrate just how easily a criterion on reporting effect-sizes in research manuscripts can be accomplished. The presentation centers on within-effect analyses of variance including the one-way design for testing pre-post hypotheses and the two-way parallel-groups design for making direct comparisons of competing treatment protocols (e.g., experimental treatment versus control). The presentation is supported with worked examples and a web site containing templates for software applications. Educational objectives: The reader will be able to: (1) explain the rationale for the increased use of estimates of effect-size in reporting results in published research manuscripts; (2) describe what an effect-size is (generally considered) and provide a rationale for its importance; (3) distinguish among the many forms of effect-size and apply their features to the most appropriate choices under specific research circumstances; and (4) appropriately report and interpret effect-sizes. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 341
页数:35
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   On the surprising longevity of flogged horses: Why there is a case for the significance test [J].
Abelson, RP .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1997, 8 (01) :12-15
[2]   Approximate confidence intervals for effect sizes [J].
Algina, J ;
Keselman, HJ .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2003, 63 (04) :537-553
[3]   The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration [J].
Altman, DG ;
Schulz, KF ;
Moher, D ;
Egger, M ;
Davidoff, F ;
Elbourne, D ;
Gotzsche, PC ;
Lang, T .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (08) :663-694
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Research in the Schools
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1963, STAT PSYCHOLOGISTS
[6]  
APA, 2001, Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, V5th, DOI DOI 10.1037/0000165-000
[7]   GUIDELINES FOR STATISTICAL REPORTING IN ARTICLES FOR MEDICAL JOURNALS - AMPLIFICATIONS AND EXPLANATIONS [J].
BAILAR, JC ;
MOSTELLER, F .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1988, 108 (02) :266-273
[8]  
Barcikowski R.S., 1981, J EDUC STATIST, V6, P267, DOI [DOI 10.3102/10769986006003267, 10.3102/10769986006003267]
[9]   DECISIONS IN SINGLE GROUP REPEATED MEASURES ANALYSIS - STATISTICAL TESTS AND 3 COMPUTER PACKAGES [J].
BARCIKOWSKI, RS ;
ROBEY, RR .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1984, 38 (02) :148-150
[10]   Statistical power and effect sizes of clinical neuropsychology research [J].
Bezeau, S ;
Graves, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 23 (03) :399-406