Benefit transfer in Europe: How reliable are transfers between countries?

被引:85
作者
Ready, R
Navrud, S
Day, B
Dubourg, R
Machado, F
Mourato, S
Spanninks, F
Rodriquez, MXV
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Agr Econ & Rural Sociol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Agr Univ Norway, N-1432 As, Norway
[3] UCL, Ctr Social & Econ Res Global Environm, London WC1E 6BT, England
[4] Univ E Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[5] Home Off, London, England
[6] Catholic Univ, Lisbon, Portugal
[7] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London, England
[8] Free Univ Amsterdam, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[9] Univ Vigo, Vigo, Spain
关键词
benefit transfer; contingent valuation; health; value transfer;
D O I
10.1023/B:EARE.0000035441.37039.8a
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The benefits for specific health impacts related to air and water quality were measured in simultaneous contingent valuation surveys conducted in five different European countries. Consistent inter-country differences in willingness to pay to avoid ill health episodes could not be explained by measurable differences in individual characteristics. International transfer of unit values resulted in an average transfer error of 38%. Accounting for measurable differences among countries in health status, income and other demographic measures, either through ad hoc adjustments to the transferred values or through value function transfer, did not improve transfer performance.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 82
页数:16
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Valuing health effects of air pollution in developing countries: The case of Taiwan [J].
Alberini, A ;
Cropper, M ;
Fu, TT ;
Krupnick, A ;
Liu, JT ;
Shaw, D ;
Harrington, W .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 34 (02) :107-126
[2]   Bid design and yea saying in single-bounded, dichotomous-choice questions [J].
Boyle, KJ ;
MacDonald, HF ;
Cheng, HT ;
McCollum, DW .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1998, 74 (01) :49-64
[3]   The validity of environmental benefits transfer: Further empirical testing [J].
Brouwer, R ;
Spaninks, FA .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 1999, 14 (01) :95-117
[4]   Environmental value transfer: state of the art and future prospects [J].
Brouwer, R .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 32 (01) :137-152
[5]   Using donation mechanisms to value nonuse benefits from public goods [J].
Champ, PA ;
Bishop, RC ;
Brown, TC ;
McCollum, DW .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 33 (02) :151-162
[6]   Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: A cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method [J].
Cummings, RG ;
Taylor, LO .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 89 (03) :649-665
[7]  
DAY B, 1999, BENEFITS TRANSFER EC
[8]  
Dubourg WR, 1997, ECONOMICA, V64, P681
[9]   IMPRECISE PREFERENCES AND THE WTP-WTA DISPARITY [J].
DUBOURG, WR ;
JONESLEE, MW ;
LOOMES, G .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1994, 9 (02) :115-133
[10]   AN INDEPENDENT SAMPLE TEST OF YEA-SAYING AND STARTING POINT BIAS IN DICHOTOMOUS-CHOICE CONTINGENT VALUATION [J].
HOLMES, TP ;
KRAMER, RA .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1995, 29 (01) :121-132