Objective - To compare prostacyclin with an analogue, iloprost, in treatment of severe pulmonary hypertension. Patients - Eight patients with severe pulmonary hypertension: primary in five, thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in three. Methods - All patients underwent right heart catheterisation. Mean (SEM) right atrial pressure was 9.9 (2.2) mm Hg, mean pulmonary artery pressure 67.4 (3.0) mm Hg, cardiac index 1.75 (0.13) 1/min/m(2) and mixed venous oxygen saturation 59.1(3.1)%. Continuous intravenous epoprostenol (prostacyclin, PGI(2)) or iloprost was given for phase I (three to six weeks); the patients were then crossed over to receive the alternate drug in an equivalent phase II. Main outcome measures-Exercise tolerance was measured at baseline and at the end of phase I and II with a 12 minute walk; distance covered, rest period, percentage drop in arterial oxygen saturation (Delta Sao(2)%) and percentage rise in heart rate (Delta HR%). Results - Walking distance covered rose from (mean (SEM)) 407.5 (73) to 591 (46) m with PGI(2) (p = 0.004) and to 602.5 (60) m while on iloprost (p = 0.008). Rest period decreased from 192 (73) seconds at baseline to 16 (16) seconds with PGI(2) (p = 0.01) and to 58 (34) seconds with iloprost (p = 0.008). Delta HR% was 37.5(6)% at baseline, 35(3)% on PGI(2), and 24(6)% on iloprost (p = 0.04). Conclusions - Both intravenous PGI(2) and iloprost caused significant improvement in exercise tolerance. Iloprost offers an alternative to PGI(2) treatment of severe pulmonary hypertension.