Comparison of the risk of adverse events with pramipexole and ropinirole in patients with Parkinson's disease - A meta-analysis

被引:68
作者
Etminan, M
Gill, S
Samii, A
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Baycrest Ctr Geriatr Care, Kunin Lunenfeld Appl Res Unit, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Neurol, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00002018-200326060-00005
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Pramipexole and ropinirole are relatively new dopamine agonists, both of which have proven efficacy in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. There is, however, uncertainty regarding differences in the adverse event profiles associated with each drug. Objective: To compare the adverse events of pramipexole and ropinirole as. reported in the peer-reviewed medical literature. Methods: We systematically reviewed the medical literature to identify randomised controlled trials of pramipexole and ropinirole used in the management of Parkinson's disease. Computerised databases (including Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the International Pharmaceutical Abstracts) were used to identify pertinent articles for inclusion in this study. Trials that compared the dopamine agonists to either levodopa or placebo were included. Analysis: Adverse events with these drugs included dizziness, nausea, hypotension, hallucinations, and somnolence. We made two separate analyses. In the first analysis, we estimated the pooled relative risk (RR) of adverse events with either pramipexole or ropinirole as compared with levodopa. In the second analysis, the pooled RRs of adverse events with pramipexole and ropinirole were compared with placebo. We used the random-effects model of DerSimonian and Laird to estimate the RRs and their corresponding 95% CIs. We tested for study heterogeneity using Q statistics. Results: There was no significant difference in the risk of dizziness, nausea, or hypotension with either drug individually or in combination when compared with levodopa. The risk of hypotension was approximately four times higher with ropinirole than pramipexole when each drug was individually compared with placebo (6.46 [95% CI 1.47-28.28] for ropinirole, and 1.65 [0.88-3.08] for pramipexole). The pooled RR (for pramipexole and ropinirole combined) of hallucinations was 1.92 (95% CI 1.08-3.43) when compared with levodopa. Relative to placebo, pramipexole had a significantly higher risk of hallucinations than ropinirole (pramipexole 5.2 [95% CI 1.97-13.72] vs ropinirole 2.75 [95% CI 0.55-13.73]). There was no significant difference in the risk of somnolence between the two drugs when each was individually compared with levodopa. When compared with placebo, the pooled RR (pramipexole and ropinirole combined) of somnolence was 3.16 (95% CI 1.62-6.13). Relative to placebo, the risk of somnolence was 2.01 (95% CI 2.17-3.16) with pramipexole and 5.73 (95% CI 2.34-14.01) with ropinirole. Conclusions: Use of ropinirole seems to be associated with a higher risk of hypotension and somnolence than use of pramipexole when compared with placebo. Use of pramipexole seems to be associated with a higher risk of hallucinations than use of ropinirole when compared with placebo.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 444
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Ropinirole for the treatment of early Parkinson's disease
    Adler, CH
    Sethi, KD
    Hauser, RA
    Davis, TL
    Hammerstad, JP
    Bertoni, J
    Taylor, RL
    SanchezRamos, J
    OBrien, CF
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1997, 49 (02) : 393 - 399
  • [2] Brooks DJ, 1998, CLIN NEUROPHARMACOL, V21, P101
  • [3] METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS
    DERSIMONIAN, R
    LAIRD, N
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03): : 177 - 188
  • [4] Falling asleep at the wheel: Motor vehicle mishaps in persons taking pramipexole and ropinirole
    Frucht, S
    Rogers, JD
    Greene, PE
    Gordon, MF
    Fahn, S
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1999, 52 (09) : 1908 - 1910
  • [5] Double-blind comparison of pramipexole and bromocriptine treatment with placebo in advanced Parkinson's disease
    Guttman, M
    Ott, E
    Tragner, H
    Bedard, PJ
    Pourcher, E
    Curran, T
    Goodridge, A
    Guttman, M
    Hobson, D
    King, D
    Martin, WRW
    Mendis, T
    Rajput, A
    Rivest, J
    Stoessl, J
    Suchowersky, O
    Moran, J
    Murphy, R
    Walsh, B
    ONeill, DO
    Klemperer, B
    Martin, M
    Oehlwein, C
    Polzer, U
    Reichmann, H
    Schimek, J
    Schlenker, M
    Schwartz, A
    Meier, D
    Traubner, P
    Benetin, J
    Bomhof, MAM
    Hovestadt, A
    Vreeling, FW
    Wolters, ECMJ
    Broddie, HG
    Clarke, C
    Clough, CJ
    Loizou, L
    Newman, PK
    Pye, IF
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1997, 49 (04) : 1060 - 1065
  • [6] Hauser RA, 2000, MOVEMENT DISORD, V15, P658, DOI 10.1002/1531-8257(200007)15:4<658::AID-MDS1009>3.0.CO
  • [7] 2-N
  • [8] PRAMIPEXOLE IN PATIENTS WITH EARLY PARKINSONS-DISEASE
    HUBBLE, JP
    KOLLER, WC
    CUTLER, NR
    SRAMEK, JJ
    FRIEDMAN, J
    GOETZ, C
    RANHOSKY, A
    KORTS, D
    ELVIN, A
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 18 (04) : 338 - 347
  • [9] Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials - An evaluation of 7 medical areas
    Ioannidis, JPA
    Lau, J
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (04): : 437 - 443
  • [10] Kieburtz K, 1997, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V278, P125